TweetFollow Us on Twitter

Jul 99 Challenge

Volume Number: 15 (1999)
Issue Number: 7
Column Tag: Programmer's Challenge

by Bob Boonstra, Westford, MA


This month, your Challenge is simple enough: generate a little HTML. Not just any HTML, of course, but HTML that displays a C or C++ program the way it looks in your Metrowerks CodeWarrior editor window. The prototype for the code you should write is:

#if defined (__cplusplus)
extern "C" {

typedef struct Settings {
	unsigned long commentColor;	/*00RRGGBB*/
	unsigned long keywordColor;	/*00RRGGBB*/
	unsigned long stringColor;	/*00RRGGBB*/
	char fontName[32];		/* font to use for display */
	unsigned long fontSize;	/* size of font to use */
	unsigned long tabSize;	/* number of spaces to use for tabs */
} Settings;

long /* output length */ CtoHTML(
	const char *inputText,	/* text to convert */
	char *outputHTML,		/* converted text */
	const Settings displaySettings	/* display parameters */

#if defined (__cplusplus)

A syntactically correct C or C++ program will be provided to you as inputText. You should convert that program to HTML so that, when displayed in the current Netscape browser (4.6 as of this writing), the code will appear as the input does when opened in CodeWarrior. The output HTML should be stored in (surprise) outputHTML, and the number of characters generated should be returned by your CtoHTML routine. Your CodeWarrior display preferences are provided in displaySettings: the colors to be used for comments, keywords, and strings, the name and size of the font to be used. The tabSize parameter should be used to convert tab characters to the appropriate number of nonbreaking spaces, so that the HTML appears correct no matter what tab setting is used in CodeWarrior.

The winner will be the solution that correctly converts C into HTML in the minimum amount of execution time. Solutions within 1% of one another in total execution time will be ranked by code size and elegance.

This will be a native PowerPC Challenge, using the latest CodeWarrior environment. Solutions may be coded in C, C++, or Pascal.

This Challenge was suggested by Dennis Jones, who earns 2 Challenge points for the idea.

Three Months Ago Winner

Congratulations to Sebastian Maurer for submitting the winning entry to the April Shortest Network Challenge. This Challenge required readers to find a network of line segments connecting a specified set of nodes, minimizing both the total length of the line segments and the execution time used to create the network. Solutions were allowed to create intermediate "Steiner" nodes to reduce network length, although only one of the five solutions submitted took advantage of that option.

Sebastian's entry calculates the minimum spanning tree as a subset of the edges in a Delaunay triangulation. A concept that was also discussed by participants in the March Find A Pass Challenge, a Delaunay triangulation of a set of points in a plane has the property that the circles circumscribing the triangles do not contain any points in the set. Sebastian's solution calculates the Delaunay triangles, sorts the segments in those triangles from shortest to longest, and selects a subset of N-1 segments connecting the N points, avoiding the creation of any loops in the process.

In one of the test problems, 2000 nodes were randomly distributed within eight square regions roughly distributed in a octagonal pattern. A network generated by Sebastian's entry to this test problem is depicted below.

Network generated by Sebastian Maurer's solution

Sebastian's solution won by creating a shorter network than the other solutions. The second place solution submitted by Ernst Munter was the only entry that inserted intermediate nodes into the network. While faster, it created longer networks. Ernst decided that calculating the minimum spanning tree would be too costly, and instead calculated an approximation to the minimum spanning tree in sections. Ernst then added intermediate points until the angles formed by the segments meet a heuristic criterion. The network produced by Ernst's solution to the problem described earlier is shown in the next figure.

Network generated by Ernst Munter's solution

Note that this network contains the loops avoided by Sebastian's solution. The extra segments making up these loops account for the fact that the generated network is longer, despite the inclusion of Steiner points.

The evaluation was based on performance against 5 test cases, with an average of 2000 points per test case. The table below lists the total length of the generated networks, the number of intermediate nodes inserted into the networks, the total number of segments in the networks, the total execution time, and the overall score, as well as the code size, data size, and programming language for each of the solutions submitted. As usual, the number in parentheses after the entrant's name is the total number of Challenge points earned in all Challenges prior to this one.

Name (size) Length Intermed # of Nodes Time Connect (msec) Score Code Data Lang
Sebastian Maurer (40) 17795 0 9995 696 18042 9536 320 C
Ernst Munter (437) 18361 3869 13864 648 18598 8588 8152 C++
Randy Boring (103) 18598 0 9995 58236 38374 2572 179 C
Willeke Rieken (47) 18589 0 9995 54462 38686 6640 48 C++
Andrew Downs 27439 0 9995 522169 313867 872 32 C

Top Contestants

Listed here are the Top Contestants for the Programmer's Challenge, including everyone who has accumulated 10 or more points during the past two years. The numbers below include points awarded over the 24 most recent contests, including points earned by this month's entrants.

Rank Name Points
1. Munter, Ernst 205
2. Saxton, Tom 99
3. Boring, Randy 73
4. Maurer, Sebastian 60
5. Rieken, Willeke 51
6. Heithcock, JG 37
7. Lewis, Peter 31
8. Nicolle, Ludovic 27
9. Brown, Pat 20
10. Day, Mark 20
11. Hostetter, Mat 20
12. Mallett, Jeff 20
13. Murphy, ACC 14
14. Jones, Dennis 12
15. Hewett, Kevin 10
16. Selengut, Jared 10
17. Smith, Brad 10
18. Varilly, Patrick 10
19. Webb, Russ 10

There are three ways to earn points: (1) scoring in the top 5 of any Challenge, (2) being the first person to find a bug in a published winning solution or, (3) being the first person to suggest a Challenge that I use. The points you can win are:

1st place 20 points
2nd place 10 points
3rd place 7 points
4th place 4 points
5th place 2 points
finding bug 2 points
suggesting Challenge 2 points

Here is Sebastian Maurer's winning Shortest Network solution:

Since the minimum spanning tree (MST) is never that much longer than the Steiner tree, and since the MST is so much easier to calculate, I wont bother searching for Steiner points.
My solution works in three stages: first, construct a list of segments. Second, quicksort them from shortest to longest. Finally, connect the shortest segments together without forming loops.
The MST is a subset of the edges in a Delauney triangulation - it is good to use the triangulation's O(N) edges rather than to have to sort all possible O(N^2) edges.  Finding the Delauney graph makes for the bulk of the code. For comparison, I left the code for the exhaustive listing of edges at the end of the file.  Just replace the call to DelauneySegments() by AllSegments() in ShortestNetwork() to see the difference.
The Delauney triangulation is done following the algorithm described in the book "Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications" by M. de Berg et al.
The memory requirement is about 500 bytes per node in addition to what the test code needs. For N points, 9 N + 1 triangles are needed at the most. Each triangle
requires 40 bytes. I need 3 N segments (16 bytes each), and 2 N longs for a total of 416 bytes. The largest sample I tried was 160000 points with an 80 Mb allocation. It took a minute and a half on a 233 MHz G3.
I didn't have much time to work on robustness. There may still be ways to provide a set of nodes that will cause my program to fail.

#include "ShortestNetwork.h"

typedef struct Triangle {
	Node *a, *b, *c;
	// keep pointers to neighbors sharing an edge
	struct Triangle *ab, *bc, *ca;
	// and keep pointers to up to three children
	struct Triangle *child1, *child2, *child3;
	// mark triangles seen in tree traversal
	Boolean visited;
} Triangle;

typedef struct Segment {
	Connection c;
	double distSq;
} Segment;


long DelauneySegments(long numNodes, Node nodes[],
					  Segment *segments[],
					  Connection connections[],
					  long *numDuplicates);			  
void Quicksort(Segment segs[], long first, long last);
void BuildSpanningTree(long numNodes, Segment segs[],
					   Connection connections[],
					   long numDuplicates);


long /* numConnections */ ShortestNetwork(
	long numInitialNodes,	/* number of nodes to connect */
	long *numIntermediateNodes, /* number of nodes added by 																	ShortestNetwork */
	Node nodes[], 
		/* Nodes 0..numInitialNodes-1 are initialized on entry. */
		/* Nodes numInitialNodes..numInitialNodes+*numIntermediateNodes 				added by ShortestNetwork */
	Connection connections[],	/* connections between nodes */
	long maxNodes,
	long maxConnections
) {
	long numSegments;
	Segment *segs;
	long numDuplicates;

	if (maxConnections<numInitialNodes) return -1;
	if (maxNodes<numInitialNodes+1) return -1;

	numSegments =
		DelauneySegments(numInitialNodes, nodes, &segs,
						 connections, &numDuplicates);
	Quicksort(segs, 0, numSegments - 1 - numDuplicates);	
	BuildSpanningTree(numInitialNodes, segs, connections,
	*numIntermediateNodes = 0;

	// since I didn't add any nodes...
	return numInitialNodes - 1;


// Given an ordered list or candidate segments,
// BuildSpanningTree fills the array with the
// (numNodes - 1) connections necessary to build
// a spanning tree. If the array of segments contains
// all the necessary edges, then the spanning tree is
// minimal.
// To figure out whether to labels are equivalent,
// we iterate down the equivalence array for both
// labels until the equivalent labels are equal to
// themselves. Then we can compare.
static Boolean sameLabel(long equiv[],
						 long label1, long label2)
	while (equiv[label1] != label1)
		label1 = equiv[label1];
	while (equiv[label2] != label2)
		label2 = equiv[label2];
	return label1 == label2;


// Two nodes can only be connected if they were
// both already labeled with equivalent labels
static Boolean isConnected(long label[], long equiv[],
						   long node1, long node2)
	return (label[node1] > 0) && (label[node2] > 0) &&
			sameLabel(equiv, label[node1], label[node2]);


void BuildSpanningTree(long numNodes, Segment segs[],
					   Connection connections[],
					   long numDuplicates)
// segs should be sorted from shortest to longest
// We pick (numNodes - 1) segments, starting from shortest,
// and make sure to never make a closed loop
	long i, j, nextLabel;
	long *label =
		(long*)NewPtr((Size)(numNodes * sizeof(long)));
	long *equiv =
		(long*)NewPtr((Size)(numNodes * sizeof(long)));
	if ((label == NULL) || (equiv == NULL))
		DebugStr("\pNot enough mem in BuildSpanningTree");
	for(i = 0; i < numNodes; i++) {
		label[i] = 0;
		equiv[i] = i;
	nextLabel = 1;
	j = -1;
	for(i = numDuplicates; i < numNodes - 1; i++) {
		long node1, node2;
		do {
			j += 1;
			node1 = segs[j].c.index1;
			node2 = segs[j].c.index2;
		} while (isConnected(label, equiv, node1, node2));
		connections[i].index1 = node1;
		connections[i].index2 = node2;
		if (label[node1] == 0) {
			if (label[node2] == 0) {
				label[node1] = nextLabel;
				label[node2] = nextLabel;
				nextLabel += 1;
			} else {
				label[node1] = label[node2];
		} else {
			if (label[node2] == 0) {
				label[node2] = label[node1];
			} else {
				long lab1 = label[node1];
				long lab2 = label[node2];
				if (lab1 > lab2) {
					while (equiv[lab1] != lab1)
						lab1 = equiv[lab1];
					equiv[lab1] = lab2;
				} else {
					while (equiv[lab2] != lab2)
						lab2 = equiv[lab2];
					equiv[lab2] = lab1;



// quicksort the array of segments
// sorting records rather than pointers
// is costly, but still fast compared
// to the Delauney graph calculation
static inline void SwapSegments(Segment segs[],
								long i, long j)
	Segment temp;
	temp.c.index1 = segs[i].c.index1;
	temp.c.index2 = segs[i].c.index2;
	temp.distSq = segs[i].distSq;
	segs[i].c.index1 = segs[j].c.index1;
	segs[i].c.index2 = segs[j].c.index2;
	segs[i].distSq = segs[j].distSq;
	segs[j].c.index1 = temp.c.index1;
	segs[j].c.index2 = temp.c.index2;
	segs[j].distSq = temp.distSq;


void Quicksort(Segment segs[], long first, long last)
	long left, right;
	double dividingValue;
  	left = first;
  	right = last;
  	dividingValue = segs[(first + last) / 2].distSq;
  	do { // until right < left
  		while (segs[left].distSq < dividingValue)
  			left += 1;
  		while (segs[right].distSq > dividingValue)
  			right -= 1;
  		if (left <= right) {
  			SwapSegments(segs, left, right);
  			left += 1;
  			right -= 1;
  	} while (right >= left);
  	if (right > first)
  		Quicksort(segs, first, right);
  	if (left < last)
  		Quicksort(segs, left, last);


// Utility functions for the analytic geometry we need

// In order to figure out whether p is to the left of the
// directed line formed by the points a and b, check if
// the following determinant is positive
// |  a.x  a.y  1 |
// |  b.x  b.y  1 | > 0
// |  p.x  p.y  1 |
static double det(Node *a, Node *b, Node *c)
	// neat - the determinant above can be
	// calculated with only two multiplications
	return (b->y - a->y) * (a->x - c->x) +
		   (b->x - a->x) * (c->y - a->y);


// The vertices a, b and c of my triangles are always in
// counter clock wise order. Then a point p is inside the
// triangle only if it is to the left of the directed lines
// ab, bc and ca.
// By inside I mean *strictly* inside (not on an edge!)
static Boolean isInTriangle(Node *p, Triangle *triangle)
	return (det(triangle->a, triangle->b, p) > 0) &&
		   (det(triangle->b, triangle->c, p) > 0) &&
		   (det(triangle->c, triangle->a, p) > 0);


// By "on" I mean inside including the edges. I use
// epsilon to allow for floating point rouding problems
static Boolean isOnTriangle(Node *p, Triangle *triangle,
							double negEpsilon)
	return (det(triangle->a, triangle->b, p) > negEpsilon)
		&& (det(triangle->b, triangle->c, p) > negEpsilon)
		&& (det(triangle->c, triangle->a, p) > negEpsilon);


// In order to figure out whether p is inside the
// circumscribed circle of the triangle abc check
// whether the following determinant is positive
// |  a.x  a.y  a.x^2 + a.y^2  1 |
// |  b.x  b.y  b.x^2 + b.y^2  1 |  >  0
// |  c.x  c.y  c.x^2 + c.y^2  1 |
// |  p.x  p.y  p.x^2 + p.y^2  1 |
static Boolean isInsideCircumscribedCircle(
					Node *a, Node *b, Node *c, Node *p)
	return (a->x * a->x + a->y * a->y) * det(b, c, p)
		 - (b->x * b->x + b->y * b->y) * det(a, c, p)
		 + (c->x * c->x + c->y * c->y) * det(a, b, p)
		 - (p->x * p->x + p->y * p->y) * det(a, b, c) > 0;


// Procedures for Delauney graph calculation
// Triangles always have vertices in CCW order
// (so that det(a, b, c) is positive)
static void MakeNewTriangle(Triangle *t,
					 Node *a, Node *b, Node *c,
					 Triangle *ab, Triangle *bc,
					 Triangle *ca)
	t->a = a;
	t->b = b;
	t->c = c;
	t->ab = ab;
	t->bc = bc;
	t->ca = ca;
	t->child1 = NULL;
	t->child2 = NULL;
	t->child3 = NULL;	
	t->visited = false;
	if (det(a, b, c) <= 0)
		DebugStr("\pIllegal triangle created");


// Given two triangles with a common edge, return
// pointers to each of the four vertices involved
// (o1, c1, c2 and o2 are in CCW order. o1 and o2
// are on the outside, and c1 and c2 are common
// to both triangles), as well as pointers
// to the neighboring triangles
static void FindCommonEdge(Triangle *t1, Triangle *t2,
						   Node **o1, Node **c1,
						   Node **c2, Node **o2,
						   Triangle **o1c1, Triangle **c2o1,
						   Triangle **o2c2, Triangle **c1o2)
	if ((t1->a != t2->a) && (t1->a != t2->b) &&
		(t1->a != t2->c))
		*o1 = t1->a;
		*c1 = t1->b;
		*c2 = t1->c;
		*o1c1 = t1->ab;
		*c2o1 = t1->ca;
	} else if ((t1->b != t2->a) && (t1->b != t2->b) &&
			   (t1->b != t2->c))
		*o1 = t1->b;
		*c1 = t1->c;
		*c2 = t1->a;
		*o1c1 = t1->bc;
		*c2o1 = t1->ab;
	} else if ((t1->c != t2->a) && (t1->c != t2->b) &&
			   (t1->c != t2->c))
		*o1 = t1->c;
		*c1 = t1->a;
		*c2 = t1->b;
		*o1c1 = t1->ca;
		*c2o1 = t1->bc;
	} else {
		DebugStr("\pt1 and t2 are identical");


	if ((t2->a != t1->a) && (t2->a != t1->b) &&
		(t2->a != t1->c))
		*o2 = t2->a;
		if(*c2 != t2->b) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		if(*c1 != t2->c) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		*o2c2 = t2->ab;
		*c1o2 = t2->ca;
	} else if ((t2->b != t1->a) && (t2->b != t1->b) &&
			   (t2->b != t1->c))
		*o2 = t2->b;
		if(*c2 != t2->c) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		if(*c1 != t2->a) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		*o2c2 = t2->bc;
		*c1o2 = t2->ab;
	} else if ((t2->c != t1->a) && (t2->c != t1->b) &&
			   (t2->c != t1->c))
		*o2 = t2->c;
		if(*c2 != t2->a) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		if(*c1 != t2->b) DebugStr("\pProblem");
		*o2c2 = t2->ca;
		*c1o2 = t2->bc;
	else DebugStr("\pA very serious problem");


// Given a point p inside a triangle t,
// create the three new children of triangle t
// and update all the neighbors' pointers
static void DivideTriangleInto3(Triangle *t, Node *p)
 	MakeNewTriangle(t->child1, p, t->a, t->b,
 					t->child3, t->ab, t->child2);
	if (t->ab != NULL) {
		if (t->ab->ab == t) t->ab->ab = t->child1;
		if (t->ab->bc == t) t->ab->bc = t->child1;
		if (t->ab->ca == t) t->ab->ca = t->child1;


	MakeNewTriangle(t->child2, p, t->b, t->c,
					t->child1, t->bc, t->child3);	
	if (t->bc != NULL) {
		if (t->bc->ab == t) t->bc->ab = t->child2;
		if (t->bc->bc == t) t->bc->bc = t->child2;
		if (t->bc->ca == t) t->bc->ca = t->child2;

	MakeNewTriangle(t->child3, p, t->c, t->a,
					t->child2, t->ca, t->child1);
	if (t->ca != NULL) {
		if (t->ca->ab == t) t->ca->ab = t->child3;
		if (t->ca->bc == t) t->ca->bc = t->child3;
		if (t->ca->ca == t) t->ca->ca = t->child3;


// Given a point p on the edge between two triangles,
// create four new triangles and update all the
// edges, pointers, etc...
// The two child1 triangles will have a common edge
// and the two child2 will have a common edge
static void Divide2TrianglesInto2(
				Triangle *t1, Triangle *t2, Node *p)
	// Vertices
	Node *o1, *c1, *o2, *c2;
	// pointers to triangles on outside of quadrilateral
	Triangle *o2c2, *c2o1, *o1c1, *c1o2;
	FindCommonEdge(t1, t2, &o1, &c1, &c2, &o2,
				   &o1c1, &c2o1, &o2c2, &c1o2);
	MakeNewTriangle(t1->child1, p, c2, o1,
					t2->child1, c2o1, t1->child2);
	if (c2o1 != NULL) {
		if (c2o1->ab == t1) c2o1->ab = t1->child1;
		if (c2o1->bc == t1) c2o1->bc = t1->child1;
		if (c2o1->ca == t1) c2o1->ca = t1->child1;
	MakeNewTriangle(t1->child2, p, o1, c1,
					t1->child1, o1c1, t2->child2);
	if (o1c1 != NULL) {
		if (o1c1->ab == t1) o1c1->ab = t1->child2;
		if (o1c1->bc == t1) o1c1->bc = t1->child2;
		if (o1c1->ca == t1) o1c1->ca = t1->child2;
	MakeNewTriangle(t2->child1, p, o2, c2,
					t2->child2, o2c2, t1->child1);
	if (o2c2 != NULL) {
		if (o2c2->ab == t2) o2c2->ab = t2->child1;
		if (o2c2->bc == t2) o2c2->bc = t2->child1;
		if (o2c2->ca == t2) o2c2->ca = t2->child1;
	MakeNewTriangle(t2->child2, p, c1, o2,
					t1->child2, c1o2, t2->child1);
	if (c1o2 != NULL) {
		if (c1o2->ab == t2) c1o2->ab = t2->child2;
		if (c1o2->bc == t2) c1o2->bc = t2->child2;
		if (c1o2->ca == t2) c1o2->ca = t2->child2;


// Check whether point p is one of the fake
// points I added for convenience
static inline Boolean isSpecial(Node *p, double max)
	return (p->x > max) || (p->y > max) ||
		   (p->x < -max) || (p->y < -max);


// Two segments intersect if the endpoints of one
// lie on opposite sides of the line formed by the
// other two points, and vice-versa
static Boolean intersects(Node *a1, Node *a2,
						  Node *b1, Node *b2)
	double a1a2b1 = det(a1, a2, b1);
	double a1a2b2 = det(a1, a2, b2);
	double b1b2a1 = det(b1, b2, a1);
	double b1b2a2 = det(b1, b2, a2);
	return (((a1a2b1 > 0) && (a1a2b2 < 0)) ||
			((a1a2b1 < 0) && (a1a2b2 > 0))) &&
		   (((b1b2a1 > 0) && (b1b2a2 < 0)) ||
			((b1b2a1 < 0) && (b1b2a2 > 0)));


// LegalizeEdge flips the common edge
// between two triangles if the initial edge can not
// be part of the Delauney graph
static void LegalizeEdge(Triangle *t1, Triangle *t2,
				Triangle triangles[], int *free, double max)
	// t1 and t2 are two triangles with a common edge
	// t1 has all the edges legalized from the caller
	// t2 will need to be legalized recursively if the
	// edge shared with t1 is flipped
	// Vertices in CCW order
	Node *o1, *c1, *o2, *c2;
	// Triangles on outside of quadrilateral
	Triangle *o2c2, *c2o1, *o1c1, *c1o2;
	Boolean specialCase, generalCase;
	Boolean c1Special, c2Special, o2Special, o1Special;
	// If there is no neighboring triangle, the edge has
	// to be legal. This happens if the edge c1c2 is
	// formed by two special points
	if ((t1 == NULL) || (t2 == NULL))
	FindCommonEdge(t1, t2, &o1, &c1, &c2, &o2,
				   &o1c1, &c2o1, &o2c2, &c1o2);
	c1Special = isSpecial(c1, max);
	c2Special = isSpecial(c2, max);
	o1Special = isSpecial(o1, max);
	o2Special = isSpecial(o2, max);
	// The two common vertices can't be special
	// since all added points are inside the
	// triangle formed by the three special points 
	if (c1Special && c2Special)
		DebugStr("\pBoth common vertices are special");
	// If both opposite vertices are special
	// (this can happen if the point falls on a
	// preexisting edge) we don't flip the edge
	if (o1Special && o2Special)
	// If one of the opposite vertices is special, we
	// don't flip the edge between the two common points 
	if (o2Special || o1Special)
	// If exactly one of the common vertices is special,
	// we flip the edge if the union of both triangles
	// is concave - otherwise we won't get a proper
	// triangle after the flip
	specialCase = (c1Special || c2Special) &&
				  (intersects(o1, o2, c1, c2));
	// Finally the general case when none of the points
	// is special.
	generalCase =
		!(c1Special || c2Special ||
		  o2Special || o1Special) &&
		isInsideCircumscribedCircle(o1, c1, c2, o2);
	if (specialCase || generalCase) {		
		// Create new triangles
		Triangle *newT1, *newT2;
		newT1 = &(triangles[*free]);
		*free += 1;
		newT2 = &(triangles[*free]);
		*free += 1;
		// Assign new children
		t1->child1 = newT1;
		t1->child2 = newT2;
		t2->child1 = newT1;
		t2->child2 = newT2;
		MakeNewTriangle(newT1, o1, o2, c2,
						newT2, o2c2, c2o1);
		MakeNewTriangle(newT2, o1, c1, o2,
						o1c1, c1o2, newT1);
		// Update pointers from neighbors
		if (o2c2 != NULL) {
			if (o2c2->ab == t2) o2c2->ab = newT1;
			if (o2c2->bc == t2) o2c2->bc = newT1;
			if (o2c2->ca == t2) o2c2->ca = newT1;
		if (c2o1 != NULL) {
			if (c2o1->ab == t1) c2o1->ab = newT1;
			if (c2o1->bc == t1) c2o1->bc = newT1;
			if (c2o1->ca == t1) c2o1->ca = newT1;
		if (o1c1 != NULL) {
			if (o1c1->ab == t1) o1c1->ab = newT2;
			if (o1c1->bc == t1) o1c1->bc = newT2;
			if (o1c1->ca == t1) o1c1->ca = newT2;
		if (c1o2 != NULL) {
			if (c1o2->ab == t2) c1o2->ab = newT2;
			if (c1o2->bc == t2) c1o2->bc = newT2;
			if (c1o2->ca == t2) c1o2->ca = newT2;
		// and recursively legalize the new edges on
		// the second new triangle
		LegalizeEdge(newT1, o2c2, triangles, free, max);
		LegalizeEdge(newT2, c1o2, triangles, free, max);


// return true if the given triangle is at the
// end of the acyclic directed graph and has
// no more children
static inline Boolean isLeaf(Triangle *t)
	return ((t->child1 == NULL) &&
			(t->child2 == NULL) &&
			(t->child3 == NULL));


// Recursively find the triangle that point p is on
// (including the edge).
static Triangle* FindTriangle(Node *p, Triangle *triangle,
							  double negEpsilon)
	if (isLeaf(triangle)) return triangle;
	if ((triangle->child1 != NULL) &&
		isOnTriangle(p, triangle->child1, negEpsilon))
			return FindTriangle(p, triangle->child1,
	if ((triangle->child2 != NULL) &&
		isOnTriangle(p, triangle->child2, negEpsilon))
			return FindTriangle(p, triangle->child2,
	if ((triangle->child3 != NULL) &&
		isOnTriangle(p, triangle->child3, negEpsilon))
			return FindTriangle(p, triangle->child3,
	DebugStr("\pProblem in FindTriangle");
	return NULL;


// When p is on the edge of a triangle, this function
// returns the triangle that shares this edge
// If p lies on more than edge (i.e. on a vertex),
// then I return NULL
static Triangle* FindTheOtherTriangle(
					Node *p, Triangle *triangle,
					double epsilon)
	double detABP = det(triangle->a, triangle->b, p);
	double detBCP = det(triangle->b, triangle->c, p);
	double detCAP = det(triangle->c, triangle->a, p);
	Boolean detABPis0 = (detABP < epsilon) &&
						(detABP > - epsilon);
	Boolean detBCPis0 = (detBCP < epsilon) &&
						(detBCP > - epsilon);
	Boolean detCAPis0 = (detCAP < epsilon) &&
						(detCAP > - epsilon);
	if (detABPis0 && !detBCPis0 && !detCAPis0)
		return triangle->ab;
	if (!detABPis0 && detBCPis0 && !detCAPis0)
		return triangle->bc;
	if (!detABPis0 && !detBCPis0 && detCAPis0)
		return triangle->ca;
	if (detABPis0 || detBCPis0 || detCAPis0)
		return NULL;
		// indicate that p lies on two edges at once
	// p doesn't lie on any edge - we should
	// not have been called in this case
	DebugStr("\pProblem FindTheOtherTriangle");
	return NULL;


// If FindTheOtherTriangle returned NULL, then
// I want to find the vertex that was so close to p
static Node* FindMultipleVertex(Node *p, Triangle *t,
								double epsilon)
	double dxa = p->x - t->a->x;
	double dya = p->y - t->a->y;
	double dxb = p->x - t->b->x;
	double dyb = p->y - t->b->y;
	double dxc = p->x - t->c->x;
	double dyc = p->y - t->c->y;
	if ((dxa < epsilon) && (dxa > - epsilon))
		return t->a;
	else if ((dxb < epsilon) && (dxb > - epsilon))
		return t->b;
	else if ((dxc < epsilon) && (dxc > - epsilon))
		return t->c;
	else {
		// We should not have been called
		// if there is no neighboring point!
		// DebugStr("\pProblem in FindMultipleVertex");
		// return NULL;
		// but to be safe I'll just return anything :-)
		return t->a;


static void addPointInsideTriangle(Node *p, Triangle *t,
		Triangle *triangles, int *free, double max)
	// Now we create the three new triangles
	t->child1 = &(triangles[(*free)++]);
	t->child2 = &(triangles[(*free)++]);
	t->child3 = &(triangles[(*free)++]);
	DivideTriangleInto3(t, p);		
	// and make sure the added edges are part of
	// a real Delauney triangulation
	LegalizeEdge(t->child1, t->ab, triangles, free, max);
	LegalizeEdge(t->child2, t->bc, triangles, free, max);
 	LegalizeEdge(t->child3, t->ca, triangles, free, max);


// The final step in DelauneySegments is to traverse
// the triangle "tree" to build a list segments. This
// requires that all the nodes have the visited flag
// set to false. (Note that the tree is not really a
// tree, it's actually an "acyclic directed graph". The
// tree is no longer a tree after an edge flip).
static void ExtractSegments(
	long *numSegments, Segment segments[],
	Triangle* mother, Node nodes[], double max)
	if (mother != NULL) {
		if (!(mother->visited))
			mother->visited = true;
			if (isLeaf(mother))
				double dx, dy;
				if (!mother->ab->visited &&
					!isSpecial(mother->a, max) &&
					!isSpecial(mother->b, max))
					segments[*numSegments].c.index1 =
						mother->a - &nodes[0];
					segments[*numSegments].c.index2 =
						mother->b - &nodes[0];
					dx = mother->a->x - mother->b->x;
					dy = mother->a->y - mother->b->y;
					segments[*numSegments].distSq =
						dx * dx + dy * dy;
					*numSegments += 1;
				if (!mother->bc->visited &&
					!isSpecial(mother->b, max) &&
					!isSpecial(mother->c, max))
					segments[*numSegments].c.index1 =
						mother->b - &nodes[0];
					segments[*numSegments].c.index2 =
						mother->c - &nodes[0];
					dx = mother->b->x - mother->c->x;
					dy = mother->b->y - mother->c->y;
					segments[*numSegments].distSq =
						dx * dx + dy * dy;
					*numSegments += 1;
				if (!mother->ca->visited &&
					!isSpecial(mother->c, max) &&
					!isSpecial(mother->a, max))
					segments[*numSegments].c.index1 =
						mother->c - &nodes[0];
					segments[*numSegments].c.index2 =
						mother->a - &nodes[0];
					dx = mother->c->x - mother->a->x;
					dy = mother->c->y - mother->a->y;
					segments[*numSegments].distSq =
						dx * dx + dy * dy;
					*numSegments += 1;
				ExtractSegments(numSegments, segments,
					mother->child1, nodes, max);
				ExtractSegments(numSegments, segments,
					mother->child2, nodes, max);
				ExtractSegments(numSegments, segments,
					mother->child3, nodes, max);


// Here's where the actual Delauney triangulation
// is done. We return all the edges that are part
// of the Delauney graph.
long DelauneySegments(long numNodes, Node nodes[],
					  Segment *segments[],
					  Connection connections[],
					  long *numDuplicates)
	int i;
	long numSegments;
	Node p1, p2, p3;
	double max, dummy;
	double epsilon, negEpsilon;
	// The maximum number of triangles constructed by
	// the algorithm is 9 N + 1
	Triangle *triangles =
		(Triangle*)NewPtr((Size)((9 * numNodes + 1)
							* sizeof(Triangle)));
	Triangle *mother = &(triangles[0]);
	// free is next available position in triangle array
	int free = 1;
	*numDuplicates = 0;
	// The maximum number of edges created by any
	// triangulation is 3 N - 3 - k, where k is the
	// number of points on the boundary of the convex hull
	*segments =
		(Segment*)NewPtr((Size)((3 * numNodes - 3)
							* sizeof(Segment)));
	if ((*segments == NULL) || (triangles == NULL)) {
		DebugStr("\pNot enough memory");
		return -1;
	// Initialize mother triangle - steps 1 and 2 in book
	max = 0;
	for(i = 0; i < numNodes; i++) {
		if (nodes[i].x > max) max = nodes[i].x;
		if (nodes[i].y > max) max = nodes[i].y;
		if (nodes[i].x < -max) max = - nodes[i].x;
		if (nodes[i].y < -max) max = - nodes[i].y;
	// multiply max because I like a safety margin
	epsilon = max * 1e-12;
	negEpsilon = - epsilon;
	max *= 1.1;

	// and find the coordinates of the special triangle
	dummy = max * 3;
	p1.x = dummy;
	p1.y = 0;
	p2.x = 0;
	p2.y = dummy;
	p3.x = - dummy;
	p3.y = - dummy;
	MakeNewTriangle(mother, &p1, &p2, &p3,
	// I should shuffle the input points if I
	// really want to avoid worst case behavior
	for(i = 0; i < numNodes; i++) {
		Node *p = &(nodes[i]);
		// First find the "leaf" triangle that contains p
		Triangle *t = FindTriangle(p, mother, negEpsilon);
		if (isInTriangle(p, t))
			addPointInsideTriangle(p, t, triangles,
								   &free, max);
		else // we have a degenerate case
			Triangle *t2 =
				FindTheOtherTriangle(p, t, epsilon);
			if (t2 != NULL)
			//the point is on a shared edge, in which
			// case we find the other triangle and continue
				t->child1 = &(triangles[free++]);
				t->child2 = &(triangles[free++]);
				t2->child1 = &(triangles[free++]);
				t2->child2 = &(triangles[free++]);
				Divide2TrianglesInto2(t, t2, p);		
				// the 2 child1 triangles have a common edge
				// the 2 child2 triangles have a common edge
				LegalizeEdge(t->child1, t->child1->bc,
							 triangles, &free, max);
				LegalizeEdge(t->child2, t->child2->bc,
							 triangles, &free, max);
				LegalizeEdge(t2->child1, t2->child1->bc,
							 triangles, &free, max);		
				LegalizeEdge(t2->child2, t2->child2->bc,
							 triangles, &free, max);
			// We have a duplicate point - I just connect
			// it up right away and forget about it
				Node *q = FindMultipleVertex(p, t, epsilon);
				connections[*numDuplicates].index1 = i;
				connections[*numDuplicates].index2 =
					i + q - p;
				*numDuplicates += 1;
		// Traverse the tree to build the list of edges
	numSegments = 0;
	ExtractSegments(&numSegments, *segments,
					mother, nodes, max);
	return numSegments;
// This was my first solution that naively calculated all
// possible distances. It requires a lot of memory and
// is a very slow, but it is a lot easier to debug.
long AllSegments(long numNodes, Node nodes[],
				 Segment *segments[])
	long i, j, k;
	long numSegments = numNodes * (numNodes - 1) / 2;

	*segments = (Segment*) NewPtr((Size)(numSegments *
	if (segments == NULL)
		return -1;
	k = 0;
	for(i = 0; i < numNodes - 1; i++)
		for(j = i + 1; j < numNodes; j++) {
			double dx = nodes[i].x - nodes[j].x;
			double dy = nodes[i].y - nodes[j].y;
			(*segments)[k].c.index1 = i;
			(*segments)[k].c.index2 = j;
			(*segments)[k].distSq = dx * dx + dy * dy;
			k += 1;
	return numSegments;


Community Search:
MacTech Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Apple Final Cut Pro X 10.3.1 - Professio...
Apple Final Cut Pro X is a professional video editing solution.Completely redesigned from the ground up, Final Cut Pro adds extraordinary speed, quality, and flexibility to every part of the post-... Read more
Apple Compressor 4.3.1 - Adds power and...
Compressor adds power and flexibility to Final Cut Pro X export. Customize output settings, work faster with distributed encoding, and tap into a comprehensive set of delivery features. Features... Read more
Apple Motion 5.3.1 - Create and customiz...
Apple Motion is designed for video editors, Motion 5 lets you customize Final Cut Pro titles, transitions, and effects. Or create your own dazzling animations in 2D or 3D space, with real-time... Read more
BetterTouchTool 1.989 - Customize Multi-...
BetterTouchTool adds many new, fully customizable gestures to the Magic Mouse, Multi-Touch MacBook trackpad, and Magic Trackpad. These gestures are customizable: Magic Mouse: Pinch in / out (zoom... Read more
calibre 2.77.0 - Complete e-book library...
Calibre is a complete e-book library manager. Organize your collection, convert your books to multiple formats, and sync with all of your devices. Let Calibre be your multi-tasking digital librarian... Read more
Quicksilver 1.5.2 - Application launcher...
Quicksilver is a light, fast and free Mac application that gives you the power to control your Mac with keystrokes alone. Quicksilver allows you to find what you need quickly and easily, then act... Read more
Paperless 2.3.9 - $49.95
Paperless is a digital documents manager. Remember when everyone talked about how we would soon be a paperless society? Now it seems like we use paper more than ever. Let's face it - we need and we... Read more
Apple GarageBand 10.1.5 - Complete recor...
The new GarageBand is a whole music creation studio right inside your Mac -- complete with keyboard, synths, orchestral and percussion instruments, presets for guitar and voice, an entirely... Read more
Adobe Audition CC 2017 10.0.2 - Professi...
Audition CC 2017 is available as part of Adobe Creative Cloud for as little as $19.99/month (or $9.99/month if you're a previous Audition customer). Adobe Audition CC 2017 empowers you to create and... Read more
Adobe After Effects CC 2017 14.1 - Creat...
After Effects CC 2017 is available as part of Adobe Creative Cloud for as little as $19.99/month (or $9.99/month if you're a previous After Effects customer). The new, more connected After Effects CC... Read more

Super Mario Run dashes onto Android in M...
Super Mario Run was one of the biggest mobile launches in 2016 before it was met with a lukewarm response by many. While the game itself plays a treat, it's pretty hard to swallow the steep price for the full game. With that said, Android users... | Read more »
WarFriends Beginner's Guide: How to...
Chillingo's new game, WarFriends, is finally available world wide, and so far it's a refreshing change from common mobile game trends. The game's a mix of tower defense, third person shooter, and collectible card game. There's a lot to unpack here... | Read more »
Super Gridland (Entertainment)
Super Gridland 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Entertainment Price: $1.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: Match. Build. Survive. "exquisitely tuned" - Rock Paper Shotgun No in-app purches, and no ads! | Read more »
Red's Kingdom (Games)
Red's Kingdom 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $4.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: Mad King Mac has kidnapped your father and stolen your golden nut! Solve puzzles and battle goons as you explore and battle your... | Read more »
Turbo League Guide: How to tame the cont...
| Read more »
Fire Emblem: Heroes coming to Google Pla...
Nintendo gave us our first look at Fire Emblem: Heroes, the upcoming mobile Fire Emblem game the company hinted at last year. Revealed at the Fire Emblem Direct event held today, the game will condense the series' tactical RPG combat into bite-... | Read more »
ReSlice (Music)
ReSlice 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Music Price: $9.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: Audio Slice Machine Slice your audio samples with ReSlice and create flexible musical atoms which can be triggered by MIDI notes or... | Read more »
Stickman Surfer rides in with the tide t...
Stickson is back and this time he's taken up yet another extreme sport - surfing. Stickman Surfer is out this Thursday on both iOS and Android, so if you've been following the other Stickman adventures, you might be interested in picking this one... | Read more »
Z-Exemplar (Games)
Z-Exemplar 1.4 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $3.99, Version: 1.4 (iTunes) Description: | Read more »
5 dastardly difficult roguelikes like th...
Edmund McMillen's popular roguelike creation The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth has finally crawled onto mobile devices. It's a grotesque dual-stick shooter that tosses you into an endless, procedurally generated basement as you, the pitiable Isaac,... | Read more »

Price Scanner via

Apple Ranked ‘Most Intimate Brand’
The top ranked ‘”intimate” brands continued to outperform the S&P and Fortune 500 indices in revenue and profit over the past 10 years, according to MBLM’s Brand Intimacy 2017 Report, the largest... Read more
B-Eng introduces SSD Health Check for Mac OS
Fehraltorf, Switzerland based independant Swiss company- B-Eng has announced the release and immediate availability of SSD Health Check 1.0, the company’s new hard drive utility for Mac OS X. As the... Read more
Apple’s Education discount saves up to $300 o...
Purchase a new Mac or iPad using Apple’s Education Store and take up to $300 off MSRP. All teachers, students, and staff of any educational institution qualify for the discount. Shipping is free: -... Read more
4-core 3.7GHz Mac Pro on sale for $2290, save...
Guitar Center has the 3.7GHz 4-core Mac Pro (MD253LL/A) on sale for $2289.97 including free shipping or free local store pickup (if available). Their price is a $710 savings over standard MSRP for... Read more
128GB Apple iPad Air 2, refurbished, availabl...
Apple has Certified Refurbished 128GB iPad Air 2s WiFis available for $419 including free shipping. That’s an $80 savings over standard MSRP for this model. A standard Apple one-year warranty is... Read more
13-inch 2.7GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for...
B&H Photo has the 2015 13″ 2.7GHz/128GB Retina Apple MacBook Pro on sale for $100 off MSRP. Shipping is free, and B&H charges NY tax only: - 13″ 2.7GHz/128GB Retina MacBook Pro (MF839LL/A): $... Read more
Laptop Market – Flight To Quality? – The ‘Boo...
Preliminary quarterly PC shipments data released by Gartner Inc. last week reveal an interesting disparity between sales performance of major name PC vendors as opposed to that of less well-known... Read more
IBM and Bell Transform Canadian Enterprise Mo...
IBM and Bell Canada have announced they are joining forces to offer IBM MobileFirst for iOS market-ready enterprise applications for iPad, iPhone or Apple Watch. Bell, Canada’s largest communications... Read more
Otter Products is Closing… For a Day of Givin...
On Thursday, Feb. 9, Otter Products is closing doors to open hearts. In partnership with the OtterCares Foundation, the company is pausing operations for a day so all employees can volunteer with... Read more
15-inch 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for...
Amazon has 2015 15″ 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pros (MJLQ2LL/A) available for $1799.99 including free shipping. Apple charges $1999 for this model, so Amazon’s price is represents a $200 savings. Read more

Jobs Board

*Apple* & PC Desktop Support Technician...
Apple & PC Desktop Support Technician job in Los Angeles, CA Introduction: We have immediate job openings for several Desktop Support Technicians with one of our Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions - Apple,...
SalesSpecialist - Retail Customer Service and SalesTransform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, you're also the Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions (Multi-L...
Job Description: Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions - Apple,...
Job Description: Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
*Apple* & PC Desktop Support Technician...
Apple & PC Desktop Support Technician job in Stamford, CT We have immediate job openings for several Desktop Support Technicians with one of our most well-known Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.