TweetFollow Us on Twitter

FORTRAN Comparisons
Volume Number:8
Issue Number:7
Column Tag:Jörg's Folder

FORTRAN Comparisons

The sequel.

By Jörg Langowski, MacTutor Regular Contributing Author

After my September column on numerical precision in the two competing FORTRAN compilers from Absoft and Language Systems, we received an irate comment from an Absoft user that this comparison was not fair and I hadn’t compared both products to their maximum advantage. Excerpt (the less irate part of it) follows, the author wished that his name not be divulged:

“ Mr. Langowski runs his benchmarks using opt=3 for Language Systems but only basic optimization for Absoft. This is patently unfair. Absoft has loop unrolling and subroutine inclusion opts that he ignores. These greatly speed up the benchmarks. He also penalizes Absoft by including the -e option.

I have run similar comparisons with Absoft armed in double precision mode, so all arithmetic is comparable in accuracy. For the Whetstones, on an FX I get over 6000 with Absoft, which is better than what he gets with a Quadra 700. With a Quadra 950, I get over 13,800 MWhets from Absoft, while I get roughly 5600 from Language Systems.

I should point out that the Absoft manual discusses the problem of extended arithmetic and comparisons, and notifies you of the calls to arm the FPU. I agree that Language Systems has better support for things like Apple Events etc., but lets make sure comparisons are fair. I should also mention that Absoft routinely compiles my code, at all comparable levels of optimization, faster than does Language Systems. ”

In fact, to recommend only one of the compilers was admittedly a little too strong. I may start with the conclusion of this column, that really both Absoft and LS Fortran compilers are very good products and have their advantages and disadvantages. We contacted Absoft, who had been suspiciously silent throughout all this, and asked them to express their views. We received a very constructive letter that gives a lot of insight into the tradeoffs that compiler makers have to deal with. Here it is:

“Dear Mr. Langowski,

We would like take to this opportunity to comment on your September column in MacTutor magazine. It was stated in the article that “Absoft has recently announced MacFortran II version 3.1.” We actually began shipping version 3.1.2 of MacFortran II in October of 1991. In addition to the enhancements to the user interface, this version includes a code generator which takes advantage of the new 68040 floating point instructions and a math library for FORTRAN intrinsic functions which is based on the Motorola transcendental function library intended to be used with 68040 based machines. [in fact, I had used 3.1.2 in the tests; 3.1 was a typo. sorry. -JL].

A significant portion of the article discusses the Paranoia program which, when compiled “with Absoft MacFortran 3.1.2, with and without optimizations, produces a lot of error messages typical of floating point implementations where roundoff is not handled correctly.” The method developed in the article to achieve a diagnostic free result by turning off optimization and using the -e option to prevent the compiler from maintaining variables in registers is not the solution we would have chosen or recommended. The Paranoia program can also be successfully negotiated by simply setting the rounding precision of the floating point unit to the precision of the benchmark. This procedure is described on pages 5-13 through 5-15 of the Porting Code chapter of our manual. It has the advantage of not obviating optimization and allows the compiler to maintain values in registers while still performing rounding to the width of the variable. However, this still leaves the question of whether it is valid for a compiler to maintain values in registers as long as possible. We feel that it is, although we do recognize that there are circumstances where control over the side effects of this optimization must be made available to the programmer. In particular, we provide several options and mechanisms to assist in the development of numerically sensitive programs on machines where the register file is wider than main storage or where fast, but not necessarily IEEE conforming instructions are present. The MC68040 provides single and double precision rounded basic operations whose use can improve performance at the cost of extended precision intermediates. In addition, the VOLATILE statement (a VAX extension) allows control over individual variables.

To further illustrate the situation, consider the following program:

C 1

 a = 1.0
 b = 3.0
 c = a/b
 if (c .eq. a/b) print *,’equal’

With or without optimization, the MacFortran II compiler generates a program that correctly prints the string “equal”. On the other hand, under the same conditions, the Language Systems FORTRAN compiler produces a program that is silent. Does this indicate problems with the arithmetic generated by the Language Systems compiler? An inspection of the generated code clearly shows no errors. The Language Systems compiler exhibits seemingly anomalous behavior precisely because it does not maintain the variable “c” in a register; its’ precision is truncated to 32 bits when it is stored in memory, but the comparison with the reloaded variable is made against the full 96 bit result of the division. The Language Systems “-ansi” switch will generate code which will compare successfully, but I am certain they would not recommend indiscriminate use of the option. What this example (and Paranoia) does point out are the problems that a programmer might encounter on a machine where the width of the register file is greater than the main storage [my underline - JL]. The Microsoft compiler for Intel based computers will also fail on this example if optimization is turned off (Intel floating point units are 80 bits wide).

The section of the article which describes the results of the speed tests begins with the cautionary remark “we should therefore use the Absoft compiler at least with the -e option, and maybe also drop the optimizations.” We urge you to reconsider your conclusions as there is a large body of problems that is not sensitive to environments where greater precision is maintained in registers than in memory. To relegate these programs to slower than optimal performance achieves no useful end. Numerically sensitive programs that explore the boundaries of precision are often better served by setting the floating point unit to the rounding state they expect.

We noticed that several recommended options were not used when running the benchmarks. In particular, subroutine folding and loop unrolling. Although we have not used the Whetstone benchmark for comparison with our competitors on the Macintosh for over a year, it can dramatically demonstrate some of the performance benefits of certain optimization techniques. The real advantage of subroutine inlining or folding is typically not the elimination of the call-return sequence, but rather the opportunities for further optimizations that it exposes to the compiler. This is in fact what happens when the P3 subroutine is folded in the Whetstone benchmark. The compiler is able to determine that the loop is completely invariant and can set the result values without performing a single loop iteration. As small encapsulated functions dictated by modern programming paradigms become more commonplace, this optimization technique will yield even greater performance improvements.

When the -O option (basic optimizations) is used, innermost loops which consist of a single executable statement are automatically unrolled as is indicated on page 4-16 of our manual. This is the case in the saxpy subroutine in the Linpack benchmark. As instruction and data cache sizes become larger, multiple execution units (super-scalar processors) are introduced, and register files are expanded, loop unrolling becomes a very powerful optimization. It allows a compiler to maintain more values in registers, schedule code for the various execution units, and group data loads and stores in a attempt to minimize memory traffic.

When comparing the capabilities of two different compilers on the same piece of hardware, we feel that they each should be shown off to their greatest advantage.


Peter A. Jacobson”

Thank you very much for taking the time to reply. It was an oversight that I had not looked into changing the precision of the FPU for running Paranoia. When you set the FPU to single precision, the generated code passes in fact all the numerical accuracy tests. (for an example how to do this, see the listing).

It is probably a question of philosophy how to handle the situation when the register precision of the FPU differs from that of the memory variables. It is true that if you keep intermediate values in registers during subexpression evaluation, you may get results that differ slightly from the same set of Fortran instructions when the intermediate results have been stored in memory. The speed advantage of using internal registers to their full extent then goes together with the need for controlling yourself the FPU precision in numerically sensitive parts of your code; if such a piece of code is written using 32-bit single precision variables, you should set the FPU to single precision rounding, and reset it to its original state after you’re done with that particular routine. I suppose that is not too much work when you are developing e.g., a fast math library.

But let’s look at the optimization issue, which is where the two compilers really differ. In order to gain a fair comparison on the general-purpose quality of the code produced by both compilers, I chose those optimization levels on both systems that gave the best results on the Linpack benchmark (and incidentally also on a Monte-Carlo and a Brownian Dynamics simulation ‘real-world’ problem that I am currently dealing with). Those parameters were for LS Fortran: opt=3 and for Absoft: basic optimizations, no subroutine folding, loop unrolling level 2 or none at all (no big difference).

First of all - why is loop unrolling not an advantage in the Linpack benchmark? (Quote from my V7#1 column: “Note that the loop unrolling slows down execution here, because the time-consuming calculations are already unrolled in the source code of the Linpack package.”). One example is given in listing 2: one of the subroutines that is called by the Linpack benchmark, saxpy, which computes a constant times a vector plus a vector. This routine is already loop-unrolled, as are all the routines of the BLAS (basic linear algebra subsystem) which is actually the package of routines tested by Linpack. Therefore, if you add the loop unrolling option, all you do is checking for all the exceptions on the indices again (are they divisible by 2, 4, etc.) that are already contained in the Fortran code itself. By doing so, you create more overhead, and loop unrolling actually slows down execution.

As far as I understood the documentation, the basic optimizations in Absoft were already doing all the things that LS Fortran did at opt=3. Absoft did not get any faster on Linpack by including more options, thus, I thought that it was fair to compare the compilers at those levels.

If you look at the figures in the September 1992 issue, you see that Absoft keeps a noticeable speed advantage over LS Fortran. However, you will never gain a factor of 2 or more, as a Whetstone figure of 13000 KWhet on a Quadra - with loop unrolling and subroutine inlining turned on - might erroneously suggest. Typically, Absoft’s speed advantage is of the order of 20-30% over LS Fortran, up to 40% if you are compiling really badly written ‘spaghetti code’, because this is where Absoft’s global optimizer really shines.

The Whetstone benchmark is one that you can speed up enormously by subroutine unfolding. But this tells you more about the Whetstone benchmark than about compilers. Whetstone (see the example in listing 2) is organized in a large number of small subroutines that are called over and over again from tight loops. Thus, its result reflects very much the efficiency of subroutine calling, and the efficiency of a global optimizer to see where part or all of a subroutine becomes redundant. Inlining the subroutine P3 in the example causes one of the timing loops of the benchmarks to be eliminated. Now, if you want to test the speed of execution of a routine by calling it a zillion times from a tight loop, and the compiler reduces that zillion down to one because it is intelligent enough to see that you are just repeating yourself - which is nonsense from its point of view - the compiler has tricked you out on your timing routine. (In this case, the machine has become more intelligent than the programmer, now, that’s something we all hate, don’t we?).

If you have adopted a programming style where you break down your code into very small units, like you do in Forth, global optimizing with subroutine inlining might give you an advantage. However, typical Fortran code (unlike Forth) tends to be organized into larger entities, in a well-written, well-structured program maybe one 60-line page per subroutine. Here, subroutine inlining will do you no more good, it’ll only increase code size. Even if you get a speed advantage, it will be of the order of a few percent, contrary to what the Whetstone figures might suggest.

As to Absoft’s comment that loop unrolling becomes a very powerful optimization option as new processors with super-scalar architecture are introduced, that is right; but even the 68040 is not there yet. Absoft’s speed advantage might really become significant when the compiler is run on other processors. We’ll review the situation when new Macintoshes come out (and I finally upgrade from my Mac II).

Let’s go on from the execution speed difference to other aspects of the two compilers: The reader’s letter mentioned that he got faster compilation times for the Absoft compilers on all code he tried out, including all optimizations. Now, I don’t know on what system he got those figures; on my Mac II, I have used MacFortran II v.3.1.2 and LS Fortran 3.0. In my hands, compilation is always significantly faster under LS Fortran, e.g., the whole compile/link cycle for the Paranoia code under Absoft Fortran takes 5:04 minutes on a Mac II, and 2:57 minutes for LS Fortran on the same machine.

After all these ruminations, the basic conclusion still holds: if you need the absolutely highest execution speed (then you are probably working on a Quadra 950, too), the Absoft compiler will offer you the fastest-running code, by a 20-40% margin. When you need a Macintosh user interface to your Fortran code quickly, and want support for inter-process communication, the Language Systems implementation is far superior, but your execution times will be tens of percent points longer.

In fact, I spent some time splitting up a program of mine and compiling the time-sensitive code with Absoft Fortran using the Pascal-calling option, and the main code for the Mac interface with LS Fortran. Then I tried to link it all together. Unfortunately, this approach failed, because of naming ambiguities in the Fortran libraries. It would be really nice if the two compilers could be made to work together in this way.

Language Systems, in the meantime, has linked me some more information on AppleEvents in Fortran and another product announcement (I wish I’d get as much news from Absoft, by the way, especially on their announced AppleEvents support!):

“ It turns out that there are some workarounds to the limitations you cited, already included in v3.0:

1 The sending of ‘misc’ ‘dosc’ events is supported by the F_SendScript call, and documented in Tech Note TNF36. This is a convenient way to send text-based data. We are working on some sample source code for receiving ‘dosc’ events; I’ll send it to you when its ready.

2) here is a trick you can use to send any chunk of data with the ‘dosc’ event. By calling F_SendEvent with ‘dosc’ as the first argument, the third argument can be any handle as long as it is less than 32K and passed by value. This works because F_SendScript packs the char or string array into a handle and then calls F_SendEvent.

By the way, char or string variables work just as well as arrays in the F_SendScript call. You just have to set the linecount to 1.

A free upgrade to FORTRAN version 3.0.1 just became available. This version contains the new call F_SetAETimeOut(), which you can use to change the AppleEvent timeout from its default of 60 seconds.

This version contains a few other goodies (including support for the PROFF tool in MPW 3.2.3) and a bunch of minor bug fixes. The FORTRAN upgrade is bundled with an MPW 3.2.3 upgrade for $35.

In October we plan to introduce two new FORTRAN-related products:

TSI Graphics

A general purpose plotting library (developed in cooperation with a third party) that integrates nicely with our output window and menus.

FORTRAN Debugger

A debugging package that includes a “lint” checker, a special version of the FORTRAN runtime library, and Apple’s new source level debugger (SourceBug). The lint checker performs extensive argument checking, including mode (%val or %ref) and numeric type on all toolbox calls.”

[As you read this, I’ll probably already test those products and get ready for a review. I‘m especially looking forward to the debugger.]

MOPS news

The MOPS user community is growing, as you can see from the next letter - however, I might have to be a little more explicit on how to get and use the MOPS system ]

ATTN: Jörg Langowski via MacTutor (please forward)

Fm: Kent Hoxsey

“Dear Jörg,

I have just received (and devoured) my latest issue of MacTutor, with your update of MOPS, and I was wondering if you could help me with a couple of questions about learning FORTH.

Over the past few months, I have developed a growing interest in FORTH, through discussions on the language, articles about programmers using it, and research into the language itself. In fact, I even bought some back issues of MacTutor from a used-book dealer to get some of your old columns.

I am very interested in learning to program with MOPS, and would appreciate some guidance in how to get started. I would appreciate any guidance or recommendations you can offer. It seems to me that I need a compiler/ development system, a copy of MOPS, and a good FORTH book.

The copy of MOPS and the FORTH book I can get -relatively- easily, especially if you can recommend a good book title. However, I have not been able to find anyone who can tell me where to get a copy of NEON. Do you know where it is available? Will MOPS work with any other FORTH compiler?

I have Michael Hore’s address from MacTutor, but would be very interested in his Internet address if you have it. (Forgive my naivete, but I do not know how an AppleLink user can send mail to someone on CompuServe.)

Thank you for any assistance you can offer, and look forward to further columns on FORTH development.”

Regards, Kent

Caledonia Software, 215 Caledonia St., Sausalito, CA 94965

(415) 289-2555, Fax (415) 289-2557, Alink: RUDEDOG

Dear Kent,

First, don’t worry about getting NEON; MOPS is a fully stand-alone development system with Forth compiler and everything, only its philosophy and much of the higher-level code is based on NEON.

You can download MOPS from by ftp; it is in the “/pub/Yerk” directory. Yerk, by the way, is the successor of NEON, now in the public domain, maintained by Bob Loewenstein, an astronomer at Yerkes observatory at the University of Chicago. Yerk and Mops are very similar, the main differences being that Yerk kept the old NEON Forth kernel and Mops has its own, much faster one, and that the class structure and definitions have been changed a little in Mops over Yerk/NEON. You can download Yerk from the same place. [There is also the MacForth commercial compiler from Creative Solutions that you might want to look into. - Ed.]

For a good set of Forth books, I recommend “Starting Forth” and “Thinking Forth” by Leo Brodie, published by Prentice-Hall; they can be found through any good computer bookstore.

You can send mail to Compuserve users from AppleLink just like to Internet addresses: the Internet mail address of a Compuserve user - lets say, with ID 98765,432 - would be Note that the two numbers of the CompuServe ID in the Internet address are separated by a period, not by a comma. Michael Hore’s Internet address is:

Hope this helps,


I should also say that MOPS is meanwhile at version 2.2; here is a short message from Mike that came in recently:

“Hello again Joerg,

Mops 2.2 is now released, and is available for ftp from the usual place at courtesy of Bob Loewenstein.

I’ve made a lot of improvements to the Scroller class, in particular we now have the “panorama” idea implemented. Also the tutorial is now complete, and the first part of the rest of the manual.

I haven’t updated the user list lately, but there are several new users on Compuserve and GEnie (I’ve uploaded it to both those places).

The new MacTutor is great. [Thank you! - JL]

Cheers, Mike.”

Listing 1: Setting FPU precision in Absoft Fortran

Cset rounding precision for ABsoft Fortran
 INTEGER*4 i,getfpcontrol



 i = getfpcontrol()! get current control word
 i = (i .and. RPCLEAR)    ! clear current rounding 
 i = (i .or. RPSINGLE)    ! or in new prec.
 call setfpcontrol(i)! set new control word
Listing 2: Example subroutines from the Linpack and Whetstone benchmarks

(Whetstone, main program)
 DO 80 I=1,N8


(saxpy subroutine from the Linpack benchmark)

 subroutine saxpy(n,da,dx,incx,dy,incy)
cconstant times a vector plus a vector.
cuses unrolled loops for increments equal to one.
cjack dongarra, linpack, 3/11/78.
 real dx(1),dy(1),da
 integer i,incx,incy,ix,iy,m,mp1,n
 if (da .eq. 0.0e0) return
 if(incx.eq.1.and.incy.eq.1)go to 20
ccode for unequal increments or equal increments
cnot equal to 1
 ix = 1
 iy = 1
 if( = (-n+1)*incx + 1
 if( = (-n+1)*incy + 1
 do 10 i = 1,n
   dy(iy) = dy(iy) + da*dx(ix)
   ix = ix + incx
   iy = iy + incy
 10 continue
c  code for both increments equal to 1
c  clean-up loop
 20 m = mod(n,4)
 if( m .eq. 0 ) go to 40
 do 30 i = 1,m
 dy(i) = dy(i) + da*dx(i)
 30 continue
 if( n .lt. 4 ) return
 40 mp1 = m + 1
 do 50 i = mp1,n,4
   dy(i) = dy(i) + da*dx(i)
   dy(i + 1) = dy(i + 1) + da*dx(i + 1)
   dy(i + 2) = dy(i + 2) + da*dx(i + 2)
   dy(i + 3) = dy(i + 3) + da*dx(i + 3)
 50 continue


Community Search:
MacTech Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Apple Safari 10.0.1 - Apple's Web b...
Note: The direct download link is currently unavailable. It is available in the OS X 10.11.6 release, as well as in the Apple Security Updates. Apple Safari is Apple's web browser that comes with OS... Read more
Apple macOS Sierra 10.12.1 - The latest...
With Apple macOS Sierra, Siri makes its debut on Mac, with new features designed just for the desktop. Your Mac works with iCloud and your Apple devices in smart new ways, and intelligent... Read more
Apple iOS 10.1 - The latest version of A...
iOS 10 is the biggest release of iOS ever. A massive update to Messages brings the power of the App Store to your conversations and makes messaging more personal than ever. Find your route with... Read more
Hazel 4.0.7 - Create rules for organizin...
Hazel is your personal housekeeper, organizing and cleaning folders based on rules you define. Hazel can also manage your trash and uninstall your applications. Organize your files using a familiar... Read more
Opera 40.0.2308.90 - High-performance We...
Opera is a fast and secure browser trusted by millions of users. With the intuitive interface, Speed Dial and visual bookmarks for organizing favorite sites, news feature with fresh, relevant content... Read more
BetterTouchTool 1.93 - Customize Multi-T...
BetterTouchTool adds many new, fully customizable gestures to the Magic Mouse, Multi-Touch MacBook trackpad, and Magic Trackpad. These gestures are customizable: Magic Mouse: Pinch in / out (zoom... Read more
Backblaze - Online backup serv...
Backblaze is an online backup service designed from the ground-up for the Mac. With unlimited storage available for $5 per month, as well as a free 15-day trial, peace of mind is within reach with... Read more
Postbox 5.0.5 - Powerful and flexible em...
Postbox is a new email application that helps you organize your work life and get stuff done. It has all the elegance and simplicity of Apple Mail, but with more power and flexibility to manage even... Read more
Coda 2.5.19 - One-window Web development...
Coda is a powerful Web editor that puts everything in one place. An editor. Terminal. CSS. Files. With Coda 2, we went beyond expectations. With loads of new, much-requested features, a few surprises... Read more
Toast Titanium 15.1 - $99.99
Roxio Toast 15 Titanium, the leading DVD burner for Mac, makes burning even better, adding Roxio Secure Burn to protect your files on disc and USB in Mac- or Windows-compatible formats. Get more... Read more

Latest Forum Discussions

See All

WitchSpring2 (Games)
WitchSpring2 1.27 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $3.99, Version: 1.27 (iTunes) Description: This is the story of Luna, the Moonlight Witch as she sets out into the world. This is a sequel to Witch Spring. Witch Spring 2... | Read more »
4 popular apps getting a Halloween makeo...
'Tis the season for all things spooky. So much, so, in fact, that even apps are getting into the spirt of things, dressing up in costume and spreading jack o' lanterns all about the place. These updates bring frightening new character skins, scary... | Read more »
Pokémon GO celebrates Halloween with can...
The folks behind Pokémon GO have some exciting things planned for their Halloween celebration, the first in-game event since it launched back in July. Starting October 26 and ending on November 1, trainers will be running into large numbers of... | Read more »
Best Fiends Forever Guide: How to collec...
The fiendship in Seriously's hit Best Fiends has been upgraded this time around in Best Fiends Forever. It’s a fast-paced clicker with lots of color and style--kind of reminiscent of a ‘90s animal mascot game like Crash Bandicoot. The game... | Read more »
5 apps for the budding mixologist
Creating your own cocktails is something of an art form, requiring a knack for unique tastes and devising interesting combinations. It's easy to get started right in your own kitchen, though, even if you're a complete beginner. Try using one of... | Read more »
5 mobile strategy games to try when you...
Strategy enthusiasts everywhere are celebrating the release of Civilization VI this week, and so far everyone seems pretty satisfied with the first full release in the series since 2010. The series has always been about ultra-addictive gameplay... | Read more »
Popclaire talk to us about why The Virus...
Humanity has succumbed to a virus that’s spread throughout the world. Now the dead have risen with a hunger for human flesh, and all that remain are a few survivors. One of those survivors has just called you for help. That’s the plot in POPCLAIRE’... | Read more »
Oceans & Empires preview build sets...
Hugely ambitious sea battler Oceans & Empires is available to play in preview form now on Google Play - but download it quickly, as it’s setting sail away in just a few days. [Read more] | Read more »
Rusty Lake: Roots (Games)
Rusty Lake: Roots 1.1.4 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $2.99, Version: 1.1.4 (iTunes) Description: James Vanderboom's life drastically changes when he plants a special seed in the garden of the house he has inherited.... | Read more »
Flippy Bottle Extreme! and 3 other physi...
Flippy Bottle Extreme! takes on the bottle flipping craze with a bunch of increasingly tricky physics platforming puzzles. It's difficult and highly frustrating, but also addictive. When you begin to master the game, the sense of achievement is... | Read more »

Price Scanner via

Apple’s Thursday “Hello Again” Event A Largel...
KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who has a strong record of Apple hardware prediction accuracy, forecasts in a new note to investors released late last week that a long-overdue redo of the... Read more
12-inch Retina MacBooks on sale for $100 off...
Amazon has 2016 12″ Apple Retina MacBooks on sale for $100 off MSRP. Shipping is free: - 12″ 1.1GHz Silver Retina MacBook: $1199.99 $100 off MSRP - 12″ 1.1GHz Gold Retina MacBook: $1199.99 $100 off... Read more
Save up to $600 with Apple refurbished Mac Pr...
Apple has Certified Refurbished Mac Pros available for up to $600 off the cost of new models. An Apple one-year warranty is included with each Mac Pro, and shipping is free. The following... Read more
PixelStyle Inexpensive Photo Editor For Mac W...
PixelStyle is an all-in-one Mac Photo Editor with a huge range of high-end filters including lighting, blurs, distortions, tilt-shift, shadows, glows and so forth. PixelStyle Photo Editor for Mac... Read more
13-inch MacBook Airs on sale for $100-$140 of...
B&H has 13″ MacBook Airs on sale for $100-$140 off MSRP for a limited time. Shipping is free, and B&H charges NY sales tax only: - 13″ 1.6GHz/128GB MacBook Air (sku MMGF2LL/A): $899 $100 off... Read more
2.8GHz Mac mini available for $988, includes...
Adorama has the 2.8GHz Mac mini available for $988, $11 off MSRP, including a free copy of Apple’s 3-Year AppleCare Protection Plan. Shipping is free, and Adorama charges sales tax in NY & NJ... Read more
21-inch 3.1GHz 4K on sale for $1379, $120 off...
Adorama has the 21″ 3.1GHz 4K iMac on sale $1379.99. Shipping is free, and Adorama charges NY & NJ sales tax only. Their price is $120 off MSRP. To purchase an iMac at this price, you must first... Read more
Check Apple prices on any device with the iTr...
MacPrices is proud to offer readers a free iOS app (iPhones, iPads, & iPod touch) and Android app (Google Play and Amazon App Store) called iTracx, which allows you to glance at today’s lowest... Read more
Apple, Samsung, Lead J.D. Power Smartphone Sa...
Customer satisfaction is much higher among smartphone owners currently subscribing to full-service wireless carriers, compared with those purchasing service through a non-contract carrier, according... Read more
Select 9-inch Apple WiFi iPad Pros on sale fo...
B&H Photo has select 9.7″ Apple WiFi iPad Pros on sale for up to $50 off MSRP, each including free shipping. B&H charges sales tax in NY only: - 9″ Space Gray 256GB WiFi iPad Pro: $799 $0 off... Read more

Jobs Board

Software Engineering Intern: Frameworks at *...
Job Summary Apple is currently seeking enthusiastic interns who can work full-time for a minimum of 12-weeks between Fall 2015 and Summer 2016. Our software Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions- Nashua,...
Job Description: Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions- Napervi...
Job Description:SalesSpecialist - Retail Customer Service and SalesTransform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
Security Data Analyst - *Apple* Information...
…data sources need to be collected to allow Information Security to better protect Apple employees and customers from a wide range of threats.Act as the subject Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions (Multi-L...
Job Description: Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.