TweetFollow Us on Twitter

Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. VMware Fusion

Volume Number: 25 (2009)
Issue Number: 04
Column Tag: Virtualization

Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. VMware Fusion (cont.)

How do VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop for Mac stack up?

by Neil Ticktin, Editor-in-Chief/Publisher

Start | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Application Performance Tests

In many cases, applications today, perform so well and so fast, even under virtualized environments, that anyone would be pleased for small documents and activities. We focused our efforts on larger tasks that were not only large enough to measure, but will also stress the systems to some extent.

For Microsoft Word, we took a very large document and did a global search and replace of about 95,000 items. For Microsoft Excel, we ran a macro that generated a large quantity of random numbers, and filled cells with them. And, for PowerPoint, we had the application render slides with transitions as quickly as possible (all the other PowerPoint tests worked too fast to measure).

  • Word Global Find & Replace

    • XP: Parallels Desktop 4% faster (range: 0.5 seconds slower to 6.5 seconds faster, fastest: 34 seconds)

    • Vista: Parallels Desktop 9% faster (range: 14 seconds slower to 21 seconds faster, fastest: 42 seconds)

  • Excel Macro Test

    • XP: Parallels Desktop 14% faster (range: 0.5-1.6 seconds faster, fastest: 5.5 seconds)

    • Vista: Parallels Desktop 13% faster (range: 0.3-1.3 seconds faster, fastest: 4.5 seconds)

  • PowerPoint View slide transitions

    • XP: VMware Fusion 2% faster (range: 0.2 seconds slower to 0.2 seconds faster, fastest: 5.5 seconds)

    • Vista: Both performed almost the same (range: 4.7-5.6 seconds)


    Figure 6: Windows Application Performance

    Many web pages are simple enough that they load very quickly. So, to test the speed of Internet Explorer, we created a large, complex page in HTML loaded from a local LAN server. The page was very long, but used only common HTML elements, (no JavaScript, etc.). But, for whatever reason, VMware Fusion took significantly longer ... sometimes, an order of magnitude longer--across the board. As a result, we removed this test from the overall analysis (the average of averages ... or more technically, the geomean of geomeans) so that it wouldn't skew the overall results.

    The tests performed used the same web page ... with and without SSL.

    • Internet Explorer Load complex web page

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 82% faster (range: 40-60 seconds faster, fastest: 9 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 91% faster (range: 79-126 seconds faster, fastest: 9 seconds)

    • Internet Explorer Load complex web page (SSL)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 80% faster (range: 40-60 seconds faster, fastest: 11 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 84% faster (range: 54-80 seconds faster, fastest: 10 seconds)


    Figure 7: Internet Explorer Application Performance

    Footprint Tests

    One of the most interesting things in the virtualization market is how little overhead virtualization takes today compared to what it used to. To assess this, we measured in a variety of ways. Specifically, we focused on CPU usage (overall for the Mac), real memory usage (overall for the Mac), and how long the battery would last. CPU and memory usage were measured using "top" (a command line tool that's part of UNIX with a minimum of 50 continuous samples averaged for the result).

    We ran three CPU usage tests. The first test was to boot Windows and let it sit for a few minutes to finish up its startup activities. Once done, CPU use was measured while both the Mac OS X and Windows were sitting idle. The next test studied the same thing except both Microsoft Word and Microsoft Outlook were launched and left sitting idle. The last test explored CPU usage while playing a DVD.

    (Note: For testing the playing of a DVD, we had a bit of a challenge. Parallels Desktop supports the default application for playing DVDs that comes with Windows (Windows Media Player), but we had problems with WMP under VMware Fusion. Their web site also talks about these issues. As a workaround, VMware suggests the open source VLC Player, but we had trouble getting VLC Player to work in Parallels Desktop. It was important for both virtualization environments to use the same application, so we used Media Player Classic for the tests.)

    For the two idle tests, both virtualized environments did very, very well with only 2-5% of the CPU being used. So, while one may be 1/3 or more faster, it's not a significant difference to the user in real terms.

    • CPU use for sitting idle (in %)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 1/3rd less CPU (range: 1-8% CPU use)

        Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/3rd less CPU (range: 1-9% CPU use)

    • CPU use for VM sitting idle with both Word/Outlook (in %)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 1/5th less CPU (range: 1-8% CPU use)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/7th less CPU (range: 1-10% CPU use)

    • CPU use for play DVD (in %)

      • XP: About the same (range: 3-33% CPU use)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/25th less CPU (range: 3-36% CPU use)


    Figure 8: Virtual Machine CPU Usage

    The memory footprint was done for two idle tests, similar to the CPU usage tests above. Here, however, the differences were more meaningful, and would be noticeable to the user. Take note, we're looking at both 1GB and 2GB virtual machines here.

    • Real Memory use for sitting idle (in MB)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 48% less RAM (range: 716-1748 MB less)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 21% less RAM (range: 274-1125 MB less)

    • Real Memory use for VM sitting idle with both Word/Outlook (in MB)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 39% less RAM (range: 527-1567 MB less)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 21% less RAM (range: 257-1109 MB less)


    Figure 9: Virtual Machine Memory Usage

    Take note, Parallels is doing something interesting here with memory allocation: Parallels Desktop only takes memory from Mac OS X when Windows needs it. In other words, if you have a 2GB virtual machine, it will initially take less than 2GB of memory from the Mac, until you've opened enough application or documents that Windows needs the RAM. By contrast, VMware Fusion appears to allocate all the memory for the virtual machine at launch.

    For the exhaust battery test, we ran an "endless loop" macro in Excel that generated random numbers. When approaching the end of battery, Parallels Desktop will pause the virtual machine, and ultimately, the Mac will go into a hibernate mode saving off where things are at. VMware Fusion will suspend the virtual machine before sleeping.

    • Exhaust Battery: Endless Macro in Excel

      • XP: Parallels Desktop battery usage lasted 8% longer (9 minutes longer for 99 min total)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop battery usage lasted 9% longer (9 minutes longer for 92 min total)


    Figure 10: Virtualized Machine Battery Performance

    File and Network IO Tests

    Originally, we ran file copy tests on all the environments. In analyzing the results, we realized that there was a huge problem. Mac OS X and Windows were interfering, in a good way for typical users, with the results. Both Mac OS X and Windows have some pretty sophisticated caching schemes, but they also made File and Network IO tests unpredictable. As just one example, sometimes a MacBook was faster than a Mac Pro, and other times it was not. In the end, we tossed out the several hundred test times, and re-tested.

    Due to time constraints, the retests focused solely on the MacBook Pro. To avoid the interaction problems with Mac OS X and Windows, we tested using data set sizes that were about the same size as the physical memory, or larger. This prevented the Mac and Windows from any type of caching. The data sets we copied from one location to another were 3.7GB total (two 1.85GB files because we needed to stay below the 2GB file limit).

    The same set of files was used for all the copies so that you can see the differences between the different methods of copying. (Most of which were in the same relative time frame, except for copying to a USB Flash Drive. See the chart.)

    Networking was done via the default NAT setup in both virtualized environments, and the defaults for disk setup for each application were used as well.

    Here were the results:

    • File copy - duplicate on local virtual hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 31% faster (75 seconds faster, fastest: 165 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 43% faster (137 seconds faster, fastest: 181 seconds)

    • File copy - to local Mac hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 11% faster (18 seconds faster, fastest: 149 seconds)

      • Vista: VMware Fusion 8% faster (14 seconds faster, fastest: 181 seconds)

    • File copy - from local Mac hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 36% faster (94 seconds faster, fastest: 167 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 42% faster (134 seconds faster, fastest: 182 seconds)

    • File copy - to LAN Server

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 35% faster (113 seconds faster, fastest: 213 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 16% faster (36 seconds faster, fastest: 186 seconds)

    • File copy - from LAN Server

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 28% faster (70 seconds faster, fastest: 176 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 14% faster (27 seconds faster, fastest: 168 seconds)

    • File copy - to USB Flash Drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 6% faster (53 seconds faster, fastest: 774 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 4% faster (37 seconds faster, fastest: 859 seconds)

    • File copy - from USB Flash Drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 15% faster (52 seconds faster, fastest: 300 seconds)

      • Vista: VMware Fusion 8% faster (22 seconds faster, fastest: 283 seconds)

    Or, said much better on a graph, it looks like this:


    Figure 11: Virtual Machine File and Network I/O Performance



    Start | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
  •  

    Community Search:
    MacTech Search:

    Software Updates via MacUpdate

    The beginner's guide to Warbits
    Warbits is a turn-based strategy that's clearly inspired by Nintendo's Advance Wars series. Since turn-based strategy games can be kind of tricky to dive into, see below for a few tips to help you in the beginning. Positioning is crucial [Read... | Read more »
    How to upgrade your character in Spellsp...
    So you’ve mastered the basics of Spellspire. By which I mean you’ve realised it’s all about spelling things in a spire. What next? Well you’re going to need to figure out how to toughen up your character. It’s all well and good being able to spell... | Read more »
    5 slither.io mash-ups we'd love to...
    If there's one thing that slither.io has proved, it's that the addictive gameplay of Agar.io can be transplanted onto basically anything and it will still be good fun. It wouldn't be surprising if we saw other developers jumping on the bandwagon,... | Read more »
    How to navigate the terrain in Sky Charm...
    Sky Charms is a whimsical match-'em up adventure that uses creative level design to really ramp up the difficulty. [Read more] | Read more »
    Victorious Knight (Games)
    Victorious Knight 1.3 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $1.99, Version: 1.3 (iTunes) Description: New challenges awaits you! Experience fresh RPG experience with a unique combat mechanic, packed with high quality 3D... | Read more »
    Agent Gumball - Roguelike Spy Game (Gam...
    Agent Gumball - Roguelike Spy Game 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $2.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: Someone’s been spying on Gumball. What the what?! Two can play at that game! GO UNDERCOVERSneak past enemy... | Read more »
    Runaway Toad (Games)
    Runaway Toad 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $2.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: It ain’t easy bein’ green! Tap, hold, and swipe to help Toad hop to safety in this gorgeous new action game from the creators of... | Read more »
    PsyCard (Games)
    PsyCard 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Games Price: $1.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: From the makers och Card City Nights, Progress To 100 and Ittle Dew PSYCARD is a minesweeper-like game set in a cozy cyberpunk... | Read more »
    Sago Mini Robot Party (Education)
    Sago Mini Robot Party 1.0 Device: iOS Universal Category: Education Price: $2.99, Version: 1.0 (iTunes) Description: -- Children's Technology Review Editor's Choice -- | Read more »
    How to get a high score in every level o...
    Sky Charms is an adorable match three puzzler that provides a decent challenge thanks to its creative level design. It regularly presents something new, forcing you to think on your feet. [Read more] | Read more »

    Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

    Apple restocks Certified Refurbished Mac mini...
    Apple has restocked Certified Refurbished 2014 Mac minis, with models available starting at $419. Apple’s one-year warranty is included with each mini, and shipping is free: - 1.4GHz Mac mini: $419 $... Read more
    15-inch 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for...
    Amazon.com has the 15″ 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for $1699.99 including free shipping. Their price is $300 off MSRP, and it’s the lowest price available for this model from any reseller (and... Read more
    Apple Beats Microsoft at Own Game; Amazon Pri...
    First quarter seasonality combined with an overall disinterested customer base led to an annual decline of 14.7% in worldwide tablet shipments during the first quarter of 2016 (1Q16). Worldwide... Read more
    Tablets Had Worst Quarter Since 2012, says St...
    The global tablet market began 2016 just as 2015 left off, down. Tablet shipments fell 10% to 46.5 million units during the Q1 2016, according to the new “Preliminary Global Tablet Shipments and... Read more
    Clearance 13-inch MacBook Airs, Apple refurbi...
    Apple recently dropped prices on certified refurbished 2015 13″ MacBook Airs with 4GB of RAM with models now available starting at $759. An Apple one-year warranty is included with each MacBook, and... Read more
    Clearance 12-inch Retina MacBooks, Apple refu...
    Apple has dropped prices on Certified Refurbished 2015 12″ Retina MacBooks with models now available starting at $929. Apple will include a standard one-year warranty with each MacBook, and shipping... Read more
    Aleratec Releases Mac Software Upgrade for 1...
    California based Aleratec Inc., designer, developer and manufacturer of Portable Device Management (PDM) charge/sync products for mobile devices and professional-grade duplicators for hard disk... Read more
    Sale! Amazon offers 27-inch iMac, 13-inch 2.9...
    Amazon has the 27″ 3.2GHz 5K iMac and the 13″ 3.9GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for $300 off MSRP, each including free shipping, for a limited time: - 27″ 3.2GHz/1TB HD 5K iMac (model MK462LL/A): $... Read more
    Apple refurbished 13-inch Retina MacBook Pros...
    Apple has Certified Refurbished 13″ Retina MacBook Pros available for up to $270 off the cost of new models. An Apple one-year warranty is included with each model, and shipping is free: - 13″ 2.7GHz... Read more
    13-inch 2.7GHz/128GB Retina MacBook Pro on sa...
    Take $200 off MSRP on the price of a new 13″ 2.7GHz/128GB Retina MacBook Pro (model MF839LL/A) at Amazon. Shipping is free: - 13″ 2.7GHz/128GB Retina MacBook Pro: $1099.99 $200 off MSRP Act now if... Read more

    Jobs Board

    Restaurant Manager (Neighborhood Captain) - A...
    …in every aspect of daily operation. WHY YOU'LL LIKE IT: You'll be the Big Apple . You'll solve problems. You'll get to show your ability to handle the stress and Read more
    Automotive Sales Consultant - Apple Ford Linc...
    …you. The best candidates are smart, technologically savvy and are customer focused. Apple Ford Lincoln Apple Valley is different, because: $30,000 annual salary Read more
    *Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions - Apple,...
    Job Description: Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, Read more
    *Apple* Solutions Consultant - Apple (United...
    # Apple Solutions Consultant Job Number: 48260200 Phoenix, Arizona, United States Posted: Apr. 22, 2016 Weekly Hours: 40.00 **Job Summary** As an Apple Solutions Read more
    Restaurant Manager (Neighborhood Captain) - A...
    …in every aspect of daily operation. WHY YOU'LL LIKE IT: You'll be the Big Apple . You'll solve problems. You'll get to show your ability to handle the stress and Read more
    All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.