TweetFollow Us on Twitter

Jan 01 Challenge Volume Number: 17 (2001)
Issue Number: 1
Column Tag: Programmer's Challenge

By Bob Boonstra, Westford, MA

Tetris

When George Warner first suggested that I base a Challenge on Tetris, I was skeptical. I hadn't played Tetris in a long time, and my recollection was that Tetris is a game not only of strategy, but of manual dexterity as well. After some email conversation, however, I think we've found a way to formulate Tetris info a meaningful Challenge.

You remember how Tetris is played, right? The game is played on a board sized perhaps 10 cells wide and 20 cells high into which pieces of varying sizes are dropped. The player is able to move the pieces left or right as they drop, or to rotate them clockwise or counter-clockwise, or to drop them to the bottom of the board. The player accumulates points as each piece is positioned into its final location. As one or more rows become completely filled, those rows are removed, the other rows are shifted down, and more points are accumulated. As rows are deleted, the game progresses to higher and higher levels where the pieces drop faster and faster. The game continues until there is no room for the next piece to drop into the board.

In this month's Challenge version of Tetris, the board size is generalized to something potentially larger than 10x20, the game speed remains constant, and the game continues until a specified time limit expires. You can make one move of the current game piece, a translation or a rotation, for each tick of the game clock. You can take as long as you like to figure out the best move, but every microsecond you use to calculate your move subtracts from the time limit and reduces your opportunity to score additional points. So you need to plan your moves both carefully and quickly.

The prototype for the code you should write is:

typedef char Piece[7][7];
   /* aPiece[row][col] is 1 if aPiece occupies cell (row,col), 0 otherwise */

typedef char Board[256][256];
   /* aBoard[row][col] is -1 if cell (row,col) is empty, otherwise it is the Piece index */
   /* row 0 is the top row, col 0 is the leftmost column */

typedef enum {
   kNoMove=0,                         /* allow piece to fall normally */
   kMoveLeft, kMoveRight,         /* move piece left/right one column */
   kDrop,                              /* drop piece to bottom of board */
   kRotateClockwise,             /* rotate piece clockwise 90 degrees */
   kRotateCounterClockwise      /* rotate piece counterclockwise 90 degrees */
} MoveType;

void InitTetris(
   short boardWidth,               /* width of board in cells */
   short boardHeight,            /* height of board in cells */
   short numPieceTypes,         /* number of types of pieces */
   const Piece gamePieces[],   /* pieces to play */
   long timeToPlay                  /* game time, in milliseconds */
);

MoveType /* move active piece */ Tetris(
   const Board gameBoard,      
            /* current state of the game board, 
            bottom row is [boardHeight-1], left column is [0] */
   short activePieceTypeIndex,   /* index into gamePieces of active piece */
   short nextPieceTypeIndex,      /* index into gamePieces of next piece */
   long pointsEarned,               /* number of points earned thus far */
   long timeToGo                        /* time remaining, in milliseconds */
);

void TermTetris(void);

The Tetris Challenge will work like this. Your InitTetris routine will be called first, to allow you to set up the problem based on the board configuration and the Piece shapes to be used in the problem. Next, your Tetris routine will be called multiple times, allowing you to manipulate the falling Tetris pieces, with the objective of accumulating as many points as possible. Your Tetris routine will continue to be called until the specified timeToPlay has expired, or until no more Pieces can be placed on the board. Then your TermTetris routine will be called, allowing you to deallocate any dynamically allocated storage.

InitTetris will be provided with the width (boardWidth) and height (boardHeight) of the game Board. It will also be given the numPieceTypes gamePieces to be used in the game, and the length of the game (timeToPlay) in milliseconds.

Each call to Tetris gives you the current state of the gameBoard; you should determine what you want to do with the active game Piece and return the corresponding MoveType. The test code will attempt to translate or rotate the active game Piece according to the MoveType you specify prior to dropping the Piece down one row. If the Piece cannot be moved or rotated as you request, the Piece will simply drop down one row. When the active Piece drops as far as it can, it will remain the active piece for one more game cycle, so that you can move it left or right by one position should you so choose. The Tetris parameters also provide you with the type of the next piece to be played (nextPieceTypeIndex), the pointsEarned so far, and the timeToGo still remaining in the game.

The gameBoard will contain the value -1 in each empty cell, and the index of the Piece occupying that cell for nonempty cells. Game Piece shapes are specified in a 7x7 array, with a 1 indicating that the corresponding cell is occupied. Pieces rotations occur about the central cell in that array. When Tetris is called with a new active game Piece, the Piece will be positioned just above the gameBoard, with the bottom row of the Piece due to appear on the gameBoard the next time Tetris is called.

The winner will be the solution that scores the most Tetris points within the specified timeToPlay. You score 1 point for each row that a Piece falls when it is dropped. When you eliminate a row, you earn 100 points. If multiple rows are completed at the same time, you win additional points: the second row completed by dropping a block is worth 200 points, the third 300 points, and the fourth 400 points. If you should eliminate all blocks on the board, you earn an additional 1000 points.

The Challenge prize will be divided between the overall winner and the best scoring entry from a contestant that has not won the Challenge recently. If you have wanted to compete in the Challenge, but have been discouraged from doing so, perhaps this is your chance at some recognition and a share of the Challenge prize.

This will be a native PowerPC Challenge, using the CodeWarrior Pro 6 environment. Solutions may be coded in C, C++, or Pascal. You can also provide a solution in Java, provided you also provide a test driver equivalent to the C code provided on the web for this problem.

Three Months Ago Winner

Congratulations to Ernst Munter (Kanata, Ontario) for another Programmer's Challenge victory. Ernst submitted the winning entry to the October "Which Bills Did They Pay" Challenge. This Challenge required contestants to sort out a set of invoices and a set of payments, matching payments to invoices. The solutions had to deal with payments that settled multiple invoices and partial payments of an invoice. Scoring was based on minimizing a "late-dollar-days" value that was the product of the amount of the invoice (or part of an invoice) times the number of days the amount went unpaid, thus encouraging the solution to apply payments to the oldest applicable invoice.

Ernst beat out the second-place entry by new contestant Sue Flowers. Sue's solution generated the same late-dollar-days value that Ernst's entry generated, but required significantly more execution time to do so. In several of the larger test cases, Sue's entry generated the same bill reconciliation log as Ernst's entry did, although this was not true in all cases. Besides Ernst's and Sue's entries, two additional entries for this Challenge were submitted, but neither solved the test cases correctly.

As always, Ernst's code is well commented. His entry makes two passes through the payment list, the first time looking for either a perfect match with a single invoice or a perfect match with multiple invoices. Ernst's CombineInvoices routine uses a stack-based technique to find the combination of invoices that exactly matches the payment amount. Although I didn't specifically analyze the performance of the individual routines in Ernst's code, I believe that the CombineInvoices routine is key to the performance Ernst achieved. In the second pass, his code looks for the "best" possible partial payment match, where "best" is defined as the invoice with the invoiced amount closest to the payment amount. Finally, the code makes a third pass through any remaining unpaid invoices to calculate the late-dollar-days statistic.

The table below lists, for each of the solutions submitted, the late-dollar-days value produced by the combined test cases, the cumulative execution time, and the number of reconciliation records generated. It also provides the code size, data size, and programming language used for each entry. As usual, the number in parentheses after the entrant's name is the total number of Challenge points earned in all Challenges prior to this one.

Name$DaysTime (msecs)RecordsErrors?Code SizeData SizeLang
Ernst Munter (661)18297920.43679no2756180C++
Sue Flowers182979246.54712no4156233C
A.D.446926800.7811yes127224C++
R. S.crash138361775C++

Top Contestants...

Listed here are the Top Contestants for the Programmer's Challenge, including everyone who has accumulated 10 or more points during the past two years. The numbers below include points awarded over the 24 most recent contests, including points earned by this month's entrants.

Rank Name Points
1. Munter, Ernst 251
2. Saxton, Tom 96
3. Maurer, Sebastian 68
4. Rieken, Willeke 65
5. Boring, Randy 52
6. Shearer, Rob 48
7. Taylor, Jonathan 36
8. Wihlborg, Charles 29

... and the Top Contestants Looking For a Recent Win

Starting this month, in order to give some recognition to other participants in the Challenge, we are also going to list the high scores for contestants who have accumulated points without taking first place in a Challenge. Listed here are all of those contestants who have accumulated 6 or more points during the past two years.

9. Downs, Andrew 12
10. Jones, Dennis 12
11. Day, Mark 10
12. Duga, Brady 10
13. Fazekas, Miklos 10
14. Flowers, Sue 10
15. Selengut, Jared 10
16. Strout, Joe 10
17. Hala, Ladislav 7
18. Miller, Mike 7
19. Nicolle, Ludovic 7
20. Schotsman, Jan 7
21. Widyyatama, Yudhi 7
22. Heithcock, JG 6

There are three ways to earn points: (1) scoring in the top 5 of any Challenge, (2) being the first person to find a bug in a published winning solution or, (3) being the first person to suggest a Challenge that I use. The points you can win are:

1st place 20 points
2nd place 10 points
3rd place 7 points
4th place 4 points
5th place 2 points
finding bug 2 points
suggesting Challenge 2 points

Here is Ernst's winning "What Bills Did They Pay" solution:

WhichBills.cp
Copyright © 2000
Ernst Munter

/*
October 4, 2000.
Submission to MacTech Programmer's Challenge for October 2000.
Copyright © 2000, Ernst Munter, Kanata, ON, Canada.
  
      "What Bills Did They Pay"

The Problem
------
Reconcile a set of invoices and payments where invoices may be paid with more than one
instalment,  and where payments may cover several invoices. 

The objective is to minimize the overall "late dollar days" subject to a set of rules. 

The Solution
------
I tackle the problem in three passes over the lists of invoices and payments.  During the
first  and second phases, reconciled invoice and payment records are removed from the lists.

In the first pass, each payment may  
   - be perfectly matched to a single invoice,
   - exactly match the sum of a number of invoices,
   - not match.
   
In the second pass, any remaining payments are applied to the smallest available invoice.
This may still leave unmatched invoices or payments unreconciled.

The amount of "late dollar days" is the sum of each reconciled amount multiplied by the delay
between the invoice and the payment.

The "late dollar days" figure includes each of the remaining unmatched invoices, multiplied
by  the delay from the invoice date to the last payment date.  

Any left-over payment that cannot be reconciled is disregarded.

Minimization of "late dollar days"
-----------------
If all payments have been accounted for, the resulting "late dollar days" number is
independent of the how the payments are applied to the invoices.  This is true because all
unpaid invoices  are effectively "paid" off on the last payment day.

The objective (to minimize "late dollar days") is thus achieved when all payments are matched
against invoices.  If this is not possible, it is best to 
   - minimize the number or amount of unmatched payments,
   - leave the invoices that cannot be matched to as late a date as possible.
   
No exhaustive attempt is made of legal permutations of multiple and partial matches, to
eliminate ALL unmatched payments.  It is hoped that the heuristic approach comes fairly
close.
*/

#include "ReconcilePayments.h"

struct Calendar
// Linear calendar for calculating differences in days 
const char months[12]={0,31,28,31,30,31,30,31,31,30,31,30};
static struct Calendar {
   short startMonth[4][16];
   Calendar()
   {
      for (long y=0;y<4;y++)
      {
         startMonth[y][1]=0;
         startMonth[y][2]=months[1];
         startMonth[y][3]=startMonth[y][2]+months[2];
         if (y==0) startMonth[y][3]++;
         for (long m=4;m <= 12;m++)
            startMonth[y][m]=startMonth[y][m-1]+months[m-1];
      }
   }
} gCalendar;

// Converts a Macintosh 14-byte DateTimeRec into a long (resolution to days only).
inline long DayNumber(const DateTimeRec & x)
{
   return
      (1461*x.year-1)/4+
      gCalendar.startMonth[3 & x.year][x.month] + 
      x.day;
}

struct MyInvoice
// My version of the invoice, using linear dates
struct MyInvoice {
   long   amount;
   long   day;
   MyInvoice*   next;   // invoices are stored in a doubly linked list
   MyInvoice*   prev;
   long   number;
   MyInvoice(){}
   MyInvoice(MyInvoice* nxt,MyInvoice* prv) :
      amount(0),   day(0),
      next(nxt),   prev(prv),   
      number(0){}
   MyInvoice(const Invoice & inv,MyInvoice* nxt,MyInvoice* prv) :
      amount(inv.invoiceAmount),
      day(DayNumber(inv.invoiceDate)),
      next(nxt),
      prev(prv),
      number(inv.invoiceNumber){}
   void Remove()
   // bridges link pointers to remove invoice from the list it is on
   {
      if (next) next->prev=prev;
      prev->next=next;      
         // prev is never 0 except in the list root which is never removed
   }
};
typedef MyInvoice* MyInvoicePtr;

struct MyPayment
// My version of the payment, using linear dates
struct MyPayment {
   long   amount;
   long   day;
   MyPayment*   next;         // payments are stored in a doubly linked list
   MyPayment*   prev;
   long   number;
   MyInvoice*   mostRecentInvoice;   // .. relative to this payment
   MyPayment(){}
   MyPayment(MyPayment* nxt,MyPayment* prv) :
      amount(0),   day(0),
      next(nxt),   prev(prv),   
      number(0),   mostRecentInvoice() {}
   MyPayment(const Payment & pay,MyPayment* nxt,MyPayment* prv) :
      amount(pay.paymentAmount),
      day(DayNumber(pay.paymentDate)),
      next(nxt),   prev(prv),
      number(pay.paymentNumber),   
      mostRecentInvoice() {}
   void Remove()
   {
      if (next) next->prev=prev;
      prev->next=next;
   }
};
typedef MyPayment* MyPaymentPtr;

Count
inline 
long Count(const Invoice theInvoices[])
// Counts the number of invoices, up to the sentinel with invoiceNumber 0
{
   const Invoice* I=theInvoices-1;
   long n=0;
   while ((++I)->invoiceNumber) {n++;}
   return n;
}
 
inline
long Count(const Payment thePayments[])
// Counts the number of payments, up to the sentinel with paymentNumber 0
{
   const Payment* P=thePayments-1;
   long n=0;
   while ((++P)->paymentNumber) {n++;}
   return n;
}

Reconcile
inline
long Reconcile(long amount,Reconciliation & R,
                        MyInvoice & I,MyPayment & P)
// Copies info into a reconciliation record and returns late dollar days 
{
   long iAmount=I.amount;
//   long pAmount=P.amount;      // there is no need to track partially used payments
   R.paymentNumber=P.number;
   R.appliedAmount=amount;
   R.invoiceNumber=I.number;
   I.amount = iAmount - amount;         
//   P.amount = pAmount - amount;// there is no need to track partially used payments
   return amount*(P.day-I.day);
}

CombineInvoices
inline
MyInvoicePtr* 
CombineInvoices(long balance,MyInvoice* I,
                  MyInvoice* mostRecentInvoice,MyInvoicePtr* stack)
// Searches invoices, from the range of invoices up to "mostRecentInvoice" to add up 
// to "balance".  
// The result is a sublist on the stack.
// Returns the top of the stack, or 0 if no match was found.
{
   *stack=0; 
   MyInvoicePtr* SP=stack+1;
   while (I && (I<=mostRecentInvoice))
   {
      if (balance < I->amount)      // invoice too large: try next in list
      {
         I=I->next;               
         if ((I>mostRecentInvoice) || (I==0))   // reached end of range
         {
            I=*-SP;                         // unwind stack
            if (I==0) return 0;      // reached bottom: no multiple found
            balance += I->amount;   // restore previous balance
            I=I->next;                      // and try next in list instead
         }
         continue;
      }
      
      if (balance > I->amount)      // include this one ... perhaps
      {
         if (I<mostRecentInvoice)   
                  // it's in range, and there is at least one other
         {
            *SP++=I;            // push this invoice on stack
            balance -= I->amount;
            I=I->next;
         } else                  // go back to previously found and skip it
         {
            I=*-SP;                         // unwind stack
            if (I==0) return 0;    // reached bottom: no multiple found
            balance += I->amount;   // restore previous balance
            I=I->next;                      // and try next in list instead
         }
         continue;
      }
      
      if (balance == I->amount)      // success
      {
         *SP++=I;                  // push this invoice on stack
         return SP;               // and return stack
         
      }
   }
   return 0;
}

PartialPayment
inline
MyInvoice* PartialPayment(long balance,MyInvoice* I,
                              MyInvoice* mostRecentInvoice)
// Returns the first invoice that exactly matches the balance,
//    failing an exact match, returns the invoice with the closest higher amount.  
// Returns 0 if no exact or partial match is found.
{
   MyInvoice* bestI=0;
   long bestAmount=0x7FFFFFFF;
   while (I && (I<=mostRecentInvoice)) {
      if (I->amount == balance)
      {
         return I;
      }
      
      if (I->amount > balance)
      {
         if (I->amount < bestAmount)
         {
            bestI=I;
            bestAmount=I->amount;
         }
      }
      I=I->next;
   }
   return bestI;
}

ReconcilePayments
long ReconcilePayments (
   const Invoice theInvoices[],
   const Payment thePayments[],
   Reconciliation theReconciliation[],
   long numberOfReconciliationRecords,
   long *lateDollarDays )
// Attempts to reconcile all invoices with the payments and computes the 
//   lateDollarDays.
// Returns the number of ReconciliationRecords actually filled out.
{
                              
   // Prepare private copies of invoices                              
   long numInvoices=Count(theInvoices);
   MyInvoice* INV = new MyInvoice[numInvoices];
   
   MyInvoice* I = INV;
   const Invoice*   theI = theInvoices;
   MyInvoice iList=MyInvoice(INV,0);
   MyInvoice* mostRecentInvoice = &iList;
   
   // Link all invoices into a list
   for (int i=0;i<numInvoices;i++,theI++)
   {
      MyInvoice* nextInvoice=I+1;
      *I=MyInvoice(*theI,nextInvoice,mostRecentInvoice);
      mostRecentInvoice=I;
      I=nextInvoice;
   }
   mostRecentInvoice->next=0;
         
   // Prepare private copies of payments   
   long numPayments=Count(thePayments);
   MyPayment* PAY = new MyPayment[numPayments];
   MyPayment* P = PAY;
   const Payment*   theP = thePayments;
   MyPayment pList=MyPayment(PAY,0);
   MyPayment* lastPayment = &pList;
   
   // Link all payments into a list
   for (int p=0;p<numPayments;p++,theP++)
   {
      MyPayment* nextPayment=P+1;
      *P = MyPayment(*theP,nextPayment,lastPayment);
      lastPayment=P;
      P=nextPayment;
   }
   lastPayment->next=0;
   long lastPayday=(-P)->day;
   
   Reconciliation* R = theReconciliation;
                  // shorthand for a long variable name
   long maxR = numberOfReconciliationRecords;
                  // shorthand for a long variable name

   // Get memory for a stack for the non-recursive search
   long stackSize=1 + numInvoices;
   MyInvoicePtr*    iStack=new MyInvoicePtr[stackSize];
   
   long numR=0;
   long lateDD=0;
   
/* PHASE 1 
   Scan all payments, trying to match single or multiple invoices against them
*/
   for (P=pList.next; P; P=P->next)
   {
      I=iList.next;
      if (I==0) break;         // invoice list is empty: we're done 
      long amount=P->amount;
      long theDay=P->day;
      
      // scan forward through invoices to find a perfect match for a single invoice
      MyInvoice* perfectMatch=0;
      mostRecentInvoice=0;
      while (I && (I->day <= theDay))   
      {
         if (I->amount == amount)
         {
            perfectMatch=I;      // break on earliest match found
            break;
         }
         mostRecentInvoice=I;
         I=I->next;
      }
      P->mostRecentInvoice=mostRecentInvoice;
                  // side effect: gets invoice range for each payment
      
      // use earliest perfect match if there is one
      if (perfectMatch)   
      {
         lateDD += Reconcile(amount,R[numR++],*perfectMatch,*P);
         P->Remove();         // remove payment from list   
         perfectMatch->Remove();   // this invoice can be removed
         
         if (numR >= maxR)      // all available recRecords used: must quit
            goto phase3;
         continue;   
      }        
      
      // try combining multiple invoices 
      MyInvoicePtr* SP=
         CombineInvoices(amount,iList.next,mostRecentInvoice,iStack);
      if (SP)
      {   
         P->Remove();         // remove payment from the list   
         I=*-SP;                  // pop one invoice from the stack
         do {
            lateDD += Reconcile(I->amount,R[numR++],*I,*P);
            I->Remove();      // this invoice can be removed
            I=*-SP;               // pop next invoice from the stack
            if (numR >= maxR)   // all available recRecords used: must quit
               goto phase3;
         } while (I);
      } 
   }

/* PHASE 2 
   Scan remaining payments, trying to match them as partial payments against the remaining invoices
*/   
   for (P=pList.next; P; P=P->next)
   {
      I=iList.next;
      if (I==0) break;         // no invoices left to balance: next phase
      long amount=P->amount;
      long theDay=P->day;
      
      // find "best" partial payment
      I=PartialPayment(amount,iList.next,P->mostRecentInvoice);   
      if (I)
      {
         P->Remove();
         lateDD += Reconcile(amount,R[numR++],*I,*P);
         if (I->amount==0)
            I->Remove();
         if (numR >= maxR)      // all available recRecords used: must quit
            break;
      }
   }
      
/* PHASE 3 
   Scan remaining invoices, adding their unpaid balances to the late dollar days
*/
phase3:
   for (I = iList.next; I; I=I->next)         
      lateDD+=(lastPayday-I->day)*I->amount;

   // free dynamic memory
   delete [] iStack;
   delete [] PAY;
   delete [] INV;
   
   *lateDollarDays = lateDD;
   return numR;
}

 

Community Search:
MacTech Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Latest Forum Discussions

See All

Pack a magnifying glass and practice you...
Somehow it has already been a year since Torchlight: Infinite launched, and XD Games is celebrating by blending in what sounds like a truly fantastic new update. Fans of Cthulhu rejoice, as Whispering Mist brings some horror elements, and tests... | Read more »
Summon your guild and prepare for war in...
Netmarble is making some pretty big moves with their latest update for Seven Knights Idle Adventure, with a bunch of interesting additions. Two new heroes enter the battle, there are events and bosses abound, and perhaps most interesting, a huge... | Read more »
Make the passage of time your plaything...
While some of us are still waiting for a chance to get our hands on Ash Prime - yes, don’t remind me I could currently buy him this month I’m barely hanging on - Digital Extremes has announced its next anticipated Prime Form for Warframe. Starting... | Read more »
If you can find it and fit through the d...
The holy trinity of amazing company names have come together, to release their equally amazing and adorable mobile game, Hamster Inn. Published by HyperBeard Games, and co-developed by Mum Not Proud and Little Sasquatch Studios, it's time to... | Read more »
Amikin Survival opens for pre-orders on...
Join me on the wonderful trip down the inspiration rabbit hole; much as Palworld seemingly “borrowed” many aspects from the hit Pokemon franchise, it is time for the heavily armed animal survival to also spawn some illegitimate children as Helio... | Read more »
PUBG Mobile teams up with global phenome...
Since launching in 2019, SpyxFamily has exploded to damn near catastrophic popularity, so it was only a matter of time before a mobile game snapped up a collaboration. Enter PUBG Mobile. Until May 12th, players will be able to collect a host of... | Read more »
Embark into the frozen tundra of certain...
Chucklefish, developers of hit action-adventure sandbox game Starbound and owner of one of the cutest logos in gaming, has released their roguelike deck-builder Wildfrost. Created alongside developers Gaziter and Deadpan Games, Wildfrost will... | Read more »
MoreFun Studios has announced Season 4,...
Tension has escalated in the ever-volatile world of Arena Breakout, as your old pal Randall Fisher and bosses Fred and Perrero continue to lob insults and explosives at each other, bringing us to a new phase of warfare. Season 4, Into The Fog of... | Read more »
Top Mobile Game Discounts
Every day, we pick out a curated list of the best mobile discounts on the App Store and post them here. This list won't be comprehensive, but it every game on it is recommended. Feel free to check out the coverage we did on them in the links below... | Read more »
Marvel Future Fight celebrates nine year...
Announced alongside an advertising image I can only assume was aimed squarely at myself with the prominent Deadpool and Odin featured on it, Netmarble has revealed their celebrations for the 9th anniversary of Marvel Future Fight. The Countdown... | Read more »

Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

Every model of Apple’s 13-inch M3 MacBook Air...
Best Buy has Apple 13″ MacBook Airs with M3 CPUs in stock and on sale today for $100 off MSRP. Prices start at $999. Their prices are the lowest currently available for new 13″ M3 MacBook Airs among... Read more
Sunday Sale: Apple iPad Magic Keyboards for 1...
Walmart has Apple Magic Keyboards for 12.9″ iPad Pros, in Black, on sale for $150 off MSRP on their online store. Sale price for online orders only, in-store price may vary. Order online and choose... Read more
Apple Watch Ultra 2 now available at Apple fo...
Apple has, for the first time, begun offering Certified Refurbished Apple Watch Ultra 2 models in their online store for $679, or $120 off MSRP. Each Watch includes Apple’s standard one-year warranty... Read more
AT&T has the iPhone 14 on sale for only $...
AT&T has the 128GB Apple iPhone 14 available for only $5.99 per month for new and existing customers when you activate unlimited service and use AT&T’s 36 month installment plan. The fine... Read more
Amazon is offering a $100 discount on every M...
Amazon is offering a $100 instant discount on each configuration of Apple’s new 13″ M3 MacBook Air, in Midnight, this weekend. These are the lowest prices currently available for new 13″ M3 MacBook... Read more
You can save $300-$480 on a 14-inch M3 Pro/Ma...
Apple has 14″ M3 Pro and M3 Max MacBook Pros in stock today and available, Certified Refurbished, starting at $1699 and ranging up to $480 off MSRP. Each model features a new outer case, shipping is... Read more
24-inch M1 iMacs available at Apple starting...
Apple has clearance M1 iMacs available in their Certified Refurbished store starting at $1049 and ranging up to $300 off original MSRP. Each iMac is in like-new condition and comes with Apple’s... Read more
Walmart continues to offer $699 13-inch M1 Ma...
Walmart continues to offer new Apple 13″ M1 MacBook Airs (8GB RAM, 256GB SSD) online for $699, $300 off original MSRP, in Space Gray, Silver, and Gold colors. These are new MacBook for sale by... Read more
B&H has 13-inch M2 MacBook Airs with 16GB...
B&H Photo has 13″ MacBook Airs with M2 CPUs, 16GB of memory, and 256GB of storage in stock and on sale for $1099, $100 off Apple’s MSRP for this configuration. Free 1-2 day delivery is available... Read more
14-inch M3 MacBook Pro with 16GB of RAM avail...
Apple has the 14″ M3 MacBook Pro with 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, Certified Refurbished, available for $300 off MSRP. Each MacBook Pro features a new outer case, shipping is free, and an Apple 1-... Read more

Jobs Board

*Apple* Systems Administrator - JAMF - Activ...
…**Public Trust/Other Required:** None **Job Family:** Systems Administration **Skills:** Apple Platforms,Computer Servers,Jamf Pro **Experience:** 3 + years of Read more
IT Systems Engineer ( *Apple* Platforms) - S...
IT Systems Engineer ( Apple Platforms) at SpaceX Hawthorne, CA SpaceX was founded under the belief that a future where humanity is out exploring the stars is Read more
Nurse Anesthetist - *Apple* Hill Surgery Ce...
Nurse Anesthetist - Apple Hill Surgery Center Location: WellSpan Medical Group, York, PA Schedule: Full Time Sign-On Bonus Eligible Remote/Hybrid Regular Apply Now Read more
Housekeeper, *Apple* Valley Village - Cassi...
Apple Valley Village Health Care Center, a senior care campus, is hiring a Part-Time Housekeeper to join our team! We will train you for this position! In this role, Read more
Sublease Associate Optometrist- *Apple* Val...
Sublease Associate Optometrist- Apple Valley, CA- Target Optical Date: Apr 20, 2024 Brand: Target Optical Location: Apple Valley, CA, US, 92307 **Requisition Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.