TweetFollow Us on Twitter

Thread Performance Analysis

Volume Number: 13 (1997)
Issue Number: 1
Column Tag: Toolbox Techniques

Preempting the Mac

By Fabrizio Oddone, Torino, Italy

How to use preemptive threads and how well

This article focuses on the little known facts about the Thread Manager, an interesting and useful part of the MacOS. I assume that the reader is already familiar with the relevant Thread Manager documentation listed in the Bibliography.

Why Preemptive Threads?

One widely heard complaint against the MacOS is its supposed lack of preemptive multitasking, dubbed also "true" multitasking by the lovers of George Boole. The Thread Manager provides this "longed for" capability, but a number of gotchas, like the ones listed below, have steered developers away from adopting its most attractive features.

  • You cannot call most of the Toolbox from within a preemptive thread.
  • Preemptive threads use only half of the CPU power available to the application (the other half is reserved to cooperative threads.)
  • Preemptive threads are not available on PowerMacs.
  • There is no system-supported semaphore API. (The library enclosed with the Apple SDK is 680x0 only.)

I am going to examine each of these gripes' one by one, but before delving into the details, I would like to warn you against one very nasty Thread Manager bug. You must take this bug into account if you are willing to make use of preemptive threads in your application.

One Word of Caution

Thread Manager versions earlier than 2.1 had a "feature" that made preemptive threads practically unusable [Bechtel, 1995]. Preemptive threads did not preempt after the first threaded application launched in Threads 2.0.1. This was fixed.

Apple, in their infinite wisdom, does not tell us how to detect the fundamental bug fix. The Universal Headers 2.1 lack the relevant information as well. (I cannot comment upon the newer 2.1.1 headers because Apple does not make them available for download.) We lucky Gestalt Selectors List dwellers (thanks to Rene G.A. Ros for maintaining the mail list) have figured out a tentative answer.

Listing 1: Gestalt.c

GestaltCheck
// Checks whether a reliable Thread Manager is installed. This routine should deliver 
// TRUE if you can safely call the Thread Manager API, FALSE otherwise.
Boolean GestaltCheck(void)
{
enum {
// preemptive scheduler fix present?
gestaltSchedulerFix = 3
};
long  Gresp;
Boolean pThreads = false;
if (TrapAvailable(_Gestalt)) {
 if (Gestalt(gestaltThreadMgrAttr, &Gresp) == noErr) {
 pThreads = (Gresp & (1L << gestaltThreadMgrPresent)) &&
 (Gresp & (1L << gestaltSchedulerFix));
 }
 }
// If we are compiling for the Code Fragment Manager, check whether we can 
// successfully call the library. The gestaltThreadsLibraryPresent bit is not correctly set
// sometimes, so we don't rely on it.
#if GENERATINGCFM
if (pThreads)
 if (NewThread == (void *)kUnresolvedCFragSymbolAddress)
 pThreads = false;
#endif
return pThreads;
}

Since preemptive threads do not work as expected under outdated Thread Managers and a fixed version is freely available, your best bet is requiring the bug fix at all times. This is not official Apple gospel, so you will have to take my word for it.

Cannot Call the Toolbox Forever, I Guess

Many developers usually surrender, maybe hoping that Copland will improve matters. Unfortunately, as far as I know, Copland's preemptive processes remains subject to the very same limitation. The Toolbox and older applications will run cooperatively, sharing the same address space. Only specifically written applications not calling the Toolbox may be entitled to run preemptively in a separate, protected address space. The moral of the story, as always, is to keep the user interface code (using the Toolbox) clearly separated from the actual code (not relying on the Toolbox). If you manage to run preemptively under the Thread Manager today, chances are that you will run with little or no effort, preemptively and safely, under Copland. Also, keep the parts shared by the preemptive thread and the host application to a minimum and clearly documented. Currently, a thread has complete access to the application memory and globals, whereas a Copland process may not, due to protected memory.

Half of the CPU?

The Thread Manager 2.0 documentation states that Preemptive threads are not required to make yield calls to cause a context switch, although they certainly may, and they share 50% of their CPU time with the currently executing cooperative thread. However, calling yield from a preemptive thread is desirable if that thread is not currently busy.

This paragraph has given birth to a catastrophic superstition - that any calculation will run at half the speed if assigned to a preemptive thread, all else being inactive. Thorough tests clearly demonstrate that the facts are different and somewhat surprising. I grabbed the Apple sample code implementing the Dhrystone benchmark and I modified it in order to use either preemptive threads or cooperative threads. (CW7 Gold Reference: MacOS System Extensions: Thread Manager 2.1: Sample Applications: 68k Examples: Traffic Threads.)

Our main event loop is structured like that shown in Listing 2.

Listing 2: EventLoop.c

EventLoop
// This is our simple event loop. If you are calculating and need to use the CPU as much // as possible, pass 
a zero sleep time. If the Mac is executing only your calculations and // you pass X ticks, those X ticks are 
actually lost. Remember to reset the sleep 
// parameter to a reasonable value (usually CaretTime if a blinking cursor is visible) 
// when your application is idle again.
void EventLoop(void)
{
EventRecord event;

do {
 if (WaitNextEvent(everyEvent, &event, 0UL, nil)) {
 DoEvent(&event);

// this is a "busy" cooperative loop, waiting for the preemptive thread to finish; useful // to evaluate whether 
the CPU is evenly scheduled between the main cooperative 
// thread and the preemptive thread
#if _TESTBALANCE
 while (gDhrystoneDone == false) ;
#endif
 }
 else {
    // the else clause is executed when no events are pending; since we want to give
    // preference to the calculating thread, we explicitly tell the scheduler; if you are                          // using many 
calculating threads keep them in a list, in order to yield to each
 (void) YieldToThread(gDhrystoneThreadID);
 if (gDhrystoneDone) {
    // stuff used to update the window and the log file removed
 gDhrystoneDone = false;
 (void) SetThreadState(gDhrystoneThreadID, kReadyThreadState, kNoThreadID);
 }
 }
 }
while ( gQuit == false );
}

We want to evaluate how much time the Mac actively spends calculating, so we start by ensconcing a proper frame of reference. Since we are probing the Operating Systems behavior, but we want our findings independent of the relative speed of each Mac model, we set each Mac maximum performance level equal to 1.0 (one). With "maximum performance level" we mean the one obtained executing the test calculation within a cooperative thread, that never yields the CPU. It is better to explain the figures with an example. For a given method, a score of 1.25 means that the calculation takes one minute and fifteen seconds, compared to one minute for the same calculation taking place without yielding the CPU. Note that we nit-pickers are also very interested in evaluating possible behavioral changes when the application is kept in the background (as opposed to the foreground) and nothing else is running. Cooperative threads, when yielding, yield the CPU every 20 ticks (1/3 of a second.) Preemptive threads do not need to yield and in fact never yield in our test.

Listing 3: Yield.c

Dhrystone
// This shows my calculation routine that may be called by a cooperative or preemptive // thread. The symbol 
_COOPYIELD must be set to 0 in the latter case.

void
Dhrystone(void)
{
    // other variables removed for clarity
 register UInt32 Run_Index;

// the following gets compiled only when we don't use preemptive threads; this is very // important since you 
shall NEVER call TickCount() within a preemptive thread!
#if_COOPYIELD
 UInt32 base_Time = TickCount();
 UInt32 curr_Time;
#endif

/* Initializations */
// initialization stuff removed
 for (Run_Index = 1; Run_Index <= kNumber_Of_Runs; 
 ++Run_Index) {
 if((Run_Index & 0xFFF) == 0) YieldToAnyThread();

// the above method was originally used in the Apple sample; decidedly unwise, since // slower Macs will 
yield too little (impairing responsiveness) and faster Macs will yield // too much (wasting precious CPU time)

// calculating stuff removed

// actual yielding code
#if_COOPYIELD
 curr_Time = TickCount();
 if (curr_Time > base_Time + 20UL) {
 YieldToAnyThread();
 base_Time = curr_Time;
 }
#endif
 } 
// loop "for Run_Index"
}

All Macs were tested when running under System 7.5.1 with extensions turned off (the System incorporates Thread Manager 2.1.1), except for the SE/30 under 32 bit mode, having MODE32 7.5 installed. If not specified, 32 bit mode is implied in any case. No other applications were running, and the mouse was left quiet.

ResultsCooperative fgCooperative bgPreemptive fgPreemptive bg
Classic1.0661.2142.3041.690

LC II

1.0481.2681.4072.060
SE/30 24 bit1.0001.1011.2031.497
SE/30 32 bit1.0351.1331.2351.521
IIvx 24 bit1.0111.0471.1541.129
IIvx 32 bit1.0681.0901.1781.153
Quadra 700 24 bit1.0121.0841.080 1.341

Quadra 700 32 bit

1.0141.0851.075 1.335
PB 5401.0071.0321.0781.144

Note that the displayed results are averaged over a reasonable number of runs (ten runs at most, sometimes less since the timings settle quickly). I always treated the first run as an outliner and discarded it (because of the window updates, major context switches, etc.)

Except for a couple of Mac models, the situation is much better than one would expect, in the light of the 50% passage I have previously quoted from the Thread Manager documentation. This probably happens because of the explicit YieldToThread() call at idle time. However, our desire is to observe a constant pattern across Mac models, since we normalized our data against the faster result on each Mac. On the contrary, we cannot help but spot a significant and annoying variability in the measured behavior. A chart sharply supports our contention.

Figure 1. Thread methods compared.

I am completely at a loss here. The very same program under the very same Operating System version behaves differently, depending on the Mac model. Just when you thought that computers were deterministic devices Let's now look at the same data from another perspective.

Figure 2. Macs compared.

A quick glance at the chart may fool the reader into thinking that Macs perform better under 24 bit mode. This is not true, and remember the normalization trick. The absolute timings show that in the faster calculation, 32 bit mode always outperforms 24 bit mode. To understand this, we quote develop #9 (Winter, 1992) p. 87, "Turning on 32-bit addressing helps because it reduces interrupt handler overhead." Also, some parts of the Toolbox may run faster when 32 bit mode is on, notably QuickDraw. (I witnessed this myself on my Quadra 700, with an old SpeedoMeter version.) Rather unusually, when using threads, the opposite happens and calculations proceed at a better pace under 24 bit mode. Apple is not known for being quick at repartee, nonetheless, we are all ears waiting for a detailed explanation on this subject.

Even the worst case situation, though less pronounced, portrays a variable outcome. We obtain this chart by setting the _TESTBALANCE symbol to 1. (See Listing 2.) We conclude that the CPU is not evenly divided between the main cooperative thread and the preemptive thread. The former has a little, but significant, Mac-dependent scheduling advantage. The even point is obviously at abscissa 2.0.

Figure 3. Worst case situation.

Although with my data collection at hand I cannot but reproach the slouching gait of preemptive threads. I still think that reengineering an existing application (or writing one from scratch), and letting the user choose between preemptive and cooperative threads has no contradictions of sort. The potential speed loss occurring in the preemptive case is counterbalanced by such a user interface responsiveness that you will wonder why in the world you waited so long to implement this feature.

One last remark for those who are screaming since the start of this section, "If you don't like the default scheduler, write your own! The Thread Manager allows this!" My answer is simple - custom schedulers are intended (at least they should be) for unusual situations, not for fairly standard programming constructs. Remember that programmers, though superhuman to some extent, are mere mortals themselves. Therefore, Donald Norman's motto is still valid, "Activities that are easy to do tend to get done; those that are difficult tend not to get done."

Preemptive Threads Not Available on PowerMacs

This is not a good reason for leaving us poor 680x0 denizens (I don't own a PowerMac, yet) with sluggish applications. I have just shown that you can easily remodel a preemptive thread into a friendly, CPU-yielding, cooperative thread by conditionally compiling a short bunch of code. However, since we have advocated a preferences-based option, and we also want to take advantage of preemptive threads on PowerMacs automatically, as soon as Apple decides they are worth the effort, we have to modify the previous listing appropriately.

Listing 4: YieldRealWorld.c

DhrystoneR
// This shows a real-world calculation routine used either cooperatively or 
// preemptively, depending on a global setting.

void
DhrystoneR(void)
{
    // other variables removed for clarity
 register UInt32 Run_Index;
 
 UInt32 base_Time;
 UInt32 curr_Time;
 
    /* Initializations */
 if (gUseCooperative)
 base_Time = TickCount();
    // other initialization stuff removed
 for (Run_Index = 1; Run_Index <= kNumber_Of_Runs;
 ++Run_Index) {
    // calculating stuff removed
    // actual yielding code
 if (gUseCooperative) {
 curr_Time = TickCount();
 if (curr_Time > base_Time + 20UL) {
 YieldToAnyThread();
 base_Time = curr_Time;
 }
 }
 } 
// loop "for Run_Index"
}

Of course the application would check at initialization time whether preemptive threads are available or not (calling NewThread() and checking for paramErr), and gray out the relevant choice in the latter case. Speaking about user friendliness, I think that most users are neither aware, nor interested in the cooperative vs. preemptive issue, so we should label the two choices avoiding technical jargon.

As a last remark, while it is true that you cannot spawn preemptive threads in native mode, you can in emulation mode. My Disk Charmer application takes advantage of this.

Multiprocessing Trivia

Multiprocessing is the bleeding edge, especially now that the BeBox has been unveiled. It would be great if the Thread Manager could automatically allocate preemptive threads on multiple processors, but this does not emerge from the MP API [MP, May 1995] Daystar and Apple developed. Instead, I infer that one has to call yet another API instead of the Thread Manager's, in order to benefit from the added CPU horsepower. This is a less than elegant design decision, to say the least. At any rate, the rules an MP task must follow are the same as those pertaining to preemptive threads. So if you are preemptive, you are probably ready for multiprocessing.

No Semaphores

I think you will have to live without them, at least until they are explicitly supported (the Multiprocessing API supports semaphores and other synchronization constructs.) However, there are reasons that suggest that you avoid semaphores whenever possible. Let me try to clear the mist (or add to the confusion).

• Semaphores are good.

This is taken from Silberschatz-Galvin [1994], p. 186:

Although semaphores provide a convenient and effective mechanism for process synchronization, their incorrect use can still result in timing errors that are difficult to detect, since these errors happen only if some particular execution sequences take place, and these sequences do not always occur.

See also this brief excerpt from the Ada95 Rational:

[ ] avoided the methodological difficulties encountered by the use of low level primitives such as semaphores and signals. As is well known, such low-level primitives suffer from similar problems as gotos; it is obvious what they do and they are trivial to implement but in practice easy to misuse and can lead to programs that are difficult to maintain. [ ]

For these reasons, the adoption of higher level constructs is advocated. (Interested readers may refer to the texts above cited.) The semaphore/goto comparison reminds me that, oddly enough, the man whom first attacked gotos [Dijkstra, 1968] is the one who earlier introduced semaphores [Dijkstra, 1965].

• Semaphores are necessary.

Not strictly: you can boot a UN*X box with the semaphore facilities conveniently uninstalled.

• Semaphores are efficient.

Semaphores may be efficient, though it depends on the implementation. I recently had to write the customary "dining philosophers" program using the UN*X semaphore primitives. For the record, I used an asymmetric solution. Running under HP-UX 9 on a 68040 HP workstation produced disconcerting results. You run the program with some forty semaphores/processes, and as the CPU load skyrockets, the whole computer unbelievably slows down, crawls, and withers. The unlucky user at the console can barely move the mouse (if the dreaded X Window System is running). This is worse than the Mac while initializing a floppy. Responsiveness improves slightly, but not to a reasonable degree, if you set the friendliest priority with the ‘nice' command. By the way, did you know that UN*X has two different ‘nice' commands, one built into the C shell, and one as an external command, with two different command syntax's?

So, my advice when it comes to synchronizing primitives - if the programming language you are using supports tasking constructs, (such as Ada95, but this is not available on the Mac as I am writing this) go for it. As an added advantage, you may easily port your tasking code on different platforms. If you are stuck with a mainstream language without tasking support, (Pascal, C, C++) stay with the Thread Manager primitives.

On a related note, I have seen some semaphore implementations that use the Enqueue() and Dequeue() system calls on the net. Provided that you are only using threads and not other interrupt-level code, this method is overkill because the above mentioned system calls disable interrupts. The Thread Manager API is more desirable because the relevant critical region calls disable thread preemption only, leaving interrupts enabled [Anderson-Post, 1994].

Wish List and Concluding Remarks

Is it too much to ask Apple for a dependable, levelheaded Thread Manager? What about multiprocessing support? Was Apple fast asleep while Gassée was hard at work? I can't believe it! <evil grin> While I am at it, what about a native Event Manager well before Copland is released?

That's all, folks. You have enough material to bash Apple for the next few weeks, and enough enthusiasm to dive head over heels into preemptive threads!

Bibliography and References

Anderson, Eric and Post, Brad. "Concurrent Programming with the Thread Manager". develop, The Apple Technical Journal, issue 17 (March 1994), pp. 73-98. Apple Computer's Developer Press.

Anderson, Eric & friends. "Thread Manager for Macintosh Applications". Final Draft, Revision 2.0 (January 24, 1994). [CW7 Gold Reference: MacOS System Extensions: Thread Manager 2.1: Thread Manager Documentation].

Bechtel, Brian. "System 7.5 Update 1.0". TechNote OS 07 (February 1995).

Dijkstra, E. W. "Cooperating sequential processes". Technical Report EWD-123, Technological University, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, (1965). Reprinted in [Genuys, 1968], p. 43-112.

Dijkstra, E. W. "GOTO statement considered harmful". Communications of the ACM, 11.3.147 (1968). ACM Press.

Genuys, F. (editor). Programming Languages (1968). Academic Press, London, England.

Silberschatz, Abraham and Galvin, Peter B. Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition (1994). Addison-Wesley.

"Multiprocessor API Specification" prepared by Apple Computer and DayStar Digital, Inc. for the World Wide Developers Conference (May 1995).

Relevant Internet URL's

Multiprocessing sites:

http://www.daystar.com/

http://www.be.com/

Here you can download for free the Ada95 Rationale:

http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/

http://lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada/

The Gestalt Selectors List is here:

http://www.bio.vu.nl/home/rgaros/gestalt/

 
AAPL
$94.43
Apple Inc.
+0.49
MSFT
$44.99
Microsoft Corpora
+0.16
GOOG
$597.61
Google Inc.
+8.14

MacTech Search:
Community Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

MacBook Air EFI Firmware Update 2.9 - Fo...
MacBook Air EFI Firmware Update is recommended for MacBook Air (Mid 2011) models. This update addresses an issue where systems may take longer to wake from sleep than expected and fixes a rare issue... Read more
FileZilla 3.9.0.1 - Fast and reliable FT...
FileZilla (ported from Windows) is a fast and reliable FTP client and server with lots of useful features and an intuitive interface.Version 3.9.0.1: MSW: Fix installation issue with locked DLLs... Read more
OS X Yosemite 10.10 DP4 - Developer Prev...
Note: This is a Developer Preview. You must be a registered Apple Mac Developer to download this update. OS X Yosemite is Apple's newest operating system for Mac. An elegant design that feels... Read more
FinderPop 2.5.6 - Classic Mac utility, n...
FinderPop is a Universal preference pane that extends OS X's contextual menus using a FinderPop Items folder much as the Apple Menu Items folder used to do for the Apple menu. It has other features... Read more
SpiderOak 5.1.7 - Secure cloud backup, s...
SpiderOak is a multi-platform secure online backup, storage, access, and sharing solution engineered for the consumer and small businesses. You must first sign up to use SpiderOak. Running natively... Read more
Espionage 3.6 - Simple, state of the art...
Espionage offers state-of-the-art encryption and plausible deniability for your confidential data. Sometimes, encrypting your data isn't enough to protect it. That's why Espionage 3 goes beyond data... Read more
calibre 1.45.0 - Complete e-library mana...
Calibre is a complete e-book library manager. Organize your collection, convert your books to multiple formats, and sync with all of your devices. Let Calibre be your multi-tasking digital... Read more
iFFmpeg 4.3.1 - Convert multimedia files...
iFFmpeg is a graphical front-end for FFmpeg, a command-line tool used to convert multimedia files between formats. The command line instructions can be very hard to master/understand, so iFFmpeg does... Read more
Chromium 36.0.1985.125 - Fast and stable...
Chromium is an open-source browser project that aims to build a safer, faster, and more stable way for all Internet users to experience the web. FreeSMUG-Free OpenSource Mac User Group build is... Read more
pwSafe 3.0 - Secure password management...
pwSafe provides simple and secure password management across devices and computers. pwSafe uses iCloud to keep your password databases backed-up and synced between Macs and iOS devices. It is... Read more

Latest Forum Discussions

See All

Bio Inc. Review
Bio Inc. Review By Nadia Oxford on July 22nd, 2014 Our Rating: :: SICKENING - IN A COMPELLING WAYUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Bio Inc is about orchestrating the medical destruction of a single person. If that doesn’... | Read more »
HELMUT Review
HELMUT Review By Andrew Fisher on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: TRUNDLE SIMULATOR 2014Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad HELMUT is a fun, fleeting time-sink that offers a momentary distraction and nothing else.   | Read more »
Walkr Review
Walkr Review By Jennifer Allen on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: ORIGINAL WALKINGiPhone App - Designed for the iPhone, compatible with the iPad Walking is a bit more exciting thanks to this planet building/discovering sim reliant... | Read more »
Zombie Commando Review
Zombie Commando Review By Jennifer Allen on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: MINDLESS SLAUGHTERUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Briefly fun but ultimately forgettable, Zombie Commando will scratch an itch then be... | Read more »
Swords & Poker Adventures Review
Swords & Poker Adventures Review By Jennifer Allen on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: SOULLESS POKER PLAYUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Swords & Poker Adventures is a mishmash of Poker and RPGing, but it lacks... | Read more »
Warhammer 40,000: The Horus Heresy: Drop...
Warhammer 40,000: The Horus Heresy: Drop Assault Coming Soon to iOS Posted by Jennifer Allen on July 21st, 2014 [ permalink ] Coming soon to iOS will be an all-new Warhammer 40,000 tactical strategy game by the name of The Horus Heresy: Drop As | Read more »
A Life Worth Dying For Review
A Life Worth Dying For Review By Jordan Minor on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: A BEAUTIFUL MINDUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad A Life Worth Dying For is a fascinating portrait of a serious subject.   | Read more »
Zombie Puzzle Panic Review
Zombie Puzzle Panic Review By Jordan Minor on July 21st, 2014 Our Rating: :: THE MATCHING DEADUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Zombie Puzzle Panic puts some pretty neat undead twists on Match-3 puzzling.   | Read more »
This Week at 148Apps: July 14-18, 2014
Expert App Reviewers   So little time and so very many apps. What’s a poor iPhone/iPad lover to do? Fortunately, 148Apps is here to give you the rundown on the latest and greatest releases. And we even have a tremendous back catalog of reviews; just... | Read more »
Fallen Lords Review
Fallen Lords Review By Andrew Fisher on July 18th, 2014 Our Rating: :: FALLS SHORTiPad Only App - Designed for the iPad Fallen Lords is a decent game, but its similarity and inferiority compared to Ghost Stories makes it ultimately... | Read more »

Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

Twelve South HiRise For MacBook – Height-Adju...
If you use your MacBook as a workhorse desktop substitute, as many of us do, a laptop stand combined with an external keyboard and pointing device are pretty much obligatory if you want to avoid... Read more
Why The Mac Was Not Included In The Apple/IBM...
TUAW’s Yoni Heisler cites Fredrick Paul of Network World whoi blogged last week that the Mac’s conspicuous absence from Apple and IBM’s landmark partnership agreement represents a huge squandered... Read more
Save $100 on 13-inch Retina MacBook Pros, plu...
Adorama has 13″ Retina MacBook Pros on sale for $100 off MSRP. Shipping is free, and Adorama charges sales tax in NY & NJ only: - 13″ 2.4GHz/128GB MacBook Pro with Retina Display: $1199 - 13″ 2.... Read more
Blurr it 2.3 for iOS – Quickly Blurs Selected...
Hyderabad, India based TouchLabs has announced a new update of Blurr it 2.3, their photography app for iOS users. Blurr it allows you to blur part of the image to hide potentially sensitive or... Read more
MacBook Airs on sale for $100 off MSRP, start...
Best Buy has the new 2014 MacBook Airs on sale for up to $100 off MSRP on their online store. Choose free home shipping or free local store pickup (if available). Prices valid for online orders only... Read more
Amazon Announces Kindle Unlimited: Unlimited...
Amazon.com has introduced Kindle Unlimited — a new subscription service which allows customers to freely read as much as they want from over 600,000 Kindle books, and listen as much as they want to... Read more
New Linksys Wireless Range Extenders Boost Wi...
Linksys has announced its new lineup of Linksys Wi-Fi Range Extenders. Consumers often experience a weak wireless signal in some parts of their house or apartment caused by blocking elements such as... Read more
MacBook Airs available starting at $719
The Apple Store has Apple Certified Refurbished 2013 & 2012 MacBook Airs in stock today starting at $719. An Apple one-year warranty is included with each MacBook, and shipping is free: 2013... Read more
Get the best deals on iPad minis with Apple r...
The Apple Store has Certified Refurbished 2nd generation iPad minis with Retina Displays available for up to $130 off the cost of new models, starting at $339. Apple’s one-year warranty is included... Read more
Best Buy’s College Student Deals: $100 off Ma...
Take an additional $100 off all MacBooks and iMacs, $50 off iPad Airs and iPad minis, at Best Buy Online with their College Students Deals Savings, valid through July 25th. Anyone with a valid .EDU... Read more

Jobs Board

*Apple* Computer Technician - Fairfield Coun...
Company DescriptionWe are an Apple Authorized Sales and Service Provider. We have been selling and servicing Apple computers in the Fairfield County area for over 20 Read more
*Apple* Computer Technician - Fairfield Coun...
Company DescriptionWe are an Apple Authorized Sales and Service Provider. We have been selling and servicing Apple computers in the Fairfield County area for over 20 Read more
Mac Expert - *Apple* Online Store Mexico -...
…MUST be fluent in English and Spanish to be considered for this position At Apple , we believe that hard work, a fun environment, creativity and innovation fuel the Read more
*Apple* Computer Technician - Fairfield Coun...
Company DescriptionWe are an Apple Authorized Sales and Service Provider. We have been selling and servicing Apple computers in the Fairfield County area for over 20 Read more
Mac Expert - *Apple* Online Store - Apple (...
**Job Summary** At Apple , we believe that hard work, a fun environment, creativity and innovation fuel the ultimate customer experience. We believe each customer Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.