TweetFollow Us on Twitter

January 93 - Object-Oriented Software Engineering

Object-Oriented Software Engineering
Addison-Wesley ISBN 0-201-54435-0

Kent Sandvik

Sometimes I feel software methodologies pop up like mushrooms after a rainy day. For a while the common complaint in the object–oriented field of computing was the lack of formal analysis methodologies, while the structured programming field had it's SA/SD, SADTs and RDDs. And lo and behold, one year later we were presented with the Booch methodology named OOD (Object Oriented Design), Hierarchical Object Oriented Design (HOOD), Coad and Yourdon's Object Oriented Analysis (OOA), Solution Based Modeling (SBM) by Goldstein and Alger, and many more.

We will eventually enter a stage in the object–oriented paradigm where a clash of titans will shake out the winners and the losers. Still, the main problem with many of the OO-labeled methodologies is the lack of a comprehensive view concerning a software project. Design is nice, but you also need an overall methodology that spawns the analysis stage, design itself, implementation and, most importantly, testing as well.

At this year's OOPSLA Jacobson's Object-Oriented Software Engineering book was a popular book, so I didn't resist the temptation to pick up a copy. Jacobson's methodology, OOSE, tries to cover many of the earlier mentioned aspects of a software project.

What is OOSE?

In general, unless you can understand a methodology within a paragraph or two, my personal opinion is that we are dealing with snake oil.

In order to understand OOSE as a methodology we have to take a look at industrial engineering environments that work productively according to Jacobson. One such example he presents is the building construction industry.

In this engineering environment we have:

  1. an architecture, a defined approach selected from a universe of approaches, such as how to construct a sauna;
  2. a method, how to apply the selected architecture concepts (like how to put together the sauna walls);
  3. a process, how to scale up the method to industrial activity (how to mass produce sauna walls);
  4. and finally tools that support the architecture stage, methods and processes.

Jacobson wants to create an overall methodology that would provide a more engineering and stage-oriented process to produce software. The methodology tries to keep alive the creative part of software analysis/design, and at the same time provide an approach for making software development a rational industrial process. Most importantly, the bias for this is based on system changes that typical industrial process focuses on (compare with Japanese car manufacturers). Let's take a look at each of the following stages of software construction using Jacobson's methodology: architecture, analysis, design, and implementation.

Architecture

A very important property of a software system is its internal structure-the architecture. A good architecture makes the system easy to understand, change, test and maintain. So the properties of the architecture will determine how the system will behave during its lifetime.

Note, however, that architecture also contains the following elements: the analysis, the design and the implementation models. A method is a planned procedure by which a specified goal is achieved (step by step). A basic requirement for a good method is that it simplifies the development of systems of a particular architecture. This has been for a long time the sore point in the object oriented computing world. And still today many OO methodologies treat this requirement quite superficially according to Jacobson. He states that such methodologies assume that the objects can easily be found directly from the activity.

Often we do have such cases, but as many of us realize it requires a strong background in object modeling before 'finding the objects' becomes second nature. I'm afraid I didn't find a good solution to this problem in the book. Jacobson hints at a high level construct called a process that is usable for scaling up the design at a later stage. However, it seems the issue of finding natural objects and object interactions is something that is hard to easily mechanize, even in OOSE.

Object Oriented Analysis

As with any other analysis stage, the idea is to obtain an understanding of the application based on functional requirements. Object–oriented analysis can be characterized as an iteration between analyzing the system's behavior and its information. Here the methodology should provide help with:
  • finding the objects
  • organizing the objects
  • describing how the objects interact
  • defining the operations of the objects
  • defining the objects internally

Jacobson states that objects can be found as naturally occurring entities in the application domain. He's using the noun paradigm where a noun that exists in the domain is often a good start to learn the terminology for the object domain. When we learn more about the domain, the real objects will pop up. This is where I do think we are really dealing with an imperfect scientific methodology; it is questionable whether this can formalized into an exact procedure due to the classical problems of categorization.

Jacobson suggests organizing objects based on different criteria (active/passive, physical/conceptual, temporary/permanent/persistent, part/whole, generic/specific and so on...) as a means to conceptualize the naturally formed objects. This is just another method to learn about the domain in order to find the right objects.

The next step is to organize the objects based on various criteria. For instance, the similarity between objects might resolve into a hierarchy of objects. Another classification of objects may be based on how objects work together with other objects (for instance a house is built of doors, windows, walls…).

Booch's keynote at this year's OOPSLA was related to the art of classification, and he said that tomorrow's designers will spend more and more time working with categorization of objects.

Object interaction is defined from the way objects fit into the system. This is where the OOSE use case technique comes into picture (more about this later). The object's interface can be decided from such scenarios.

Operations on objects come naturally when we look at the object's interface. The operations can be identified directly from the application, when we consider what we want to do with the items we model. We have primitive operations (Create, Add, Delete…) as well as complex ones such as putting together a report of information based on various objects.

Finally the object should be defined internally, which includes defining the information that each object must hold.

OOSE and Object Oriented Analysis

OOSE has the concept of actors and use cases. In order to map a requirement specification to the model, we have actors that play various use case scenes, and these use cases will form the operations.

The actors represent interactions with the system, they represent everything that needs to exchange information with the system. Actors are actually outside the system, so we don't need to define them explicitly. Note that a user (an end user) could have various actor roles while using the system. This actor does a number of various operations which will trigger a sequence of transactions in a dialogue with the system. A single sequence is called a use case. A transaction is finished when the use case instance requires input from an actor.

The system model will be use case driven: when we want to change the system behavior, we remodel the appropriate actor and use case. The whole system architecture will be determined by what the user wishes to do with the total system.

NOTE: This is one of the core ideas behind OOSE

This modeling view fits very well with prototyping, user interface driven application work and re-specification of projects. Also, we can talk with the users directly and find out their requirements and preferences, eliminating the dreadful gap between specifications and the actual implementation (a sickness that has killed thousands of software projects).

Now, the use case model will control the formation of all other OOSE models, such as domain models, analysis, design, implementation and testing. The functionality specified by the use cases is then structured into a logical, implementation-level environment and further re-defined in the design model so it is resistant to change. The use cases will be implemented by the source code and should also give us tools when testing the system. Also, the use case should give us support when writing manuals and other operational instructions.

This is closely related to the notion of patterns and pattern languages for documentation use. For instance Ralph Johnson presented a paper at this year's OOPSLA-92 concerning how to structure the documentation of a framework by using a set of patterns that describes the purpose of the framework without having to know in detail how everything works.

Object Oriented Design and OOSE

During the design stage we create a design model that is a refinement of the analysis one. The analysis model was based on ideal conditions. Now we deal with reality.

We didn't want to introduce the environment earlier because we didn't want it to affect the basic structure of the system, Neither did we want the problem blurred by the complexity usually triggered when looking at the implementation environment.

So the design model is a formalization of the analysis space, where we adapt the analysis part so it works with the environment. It's a question of refining the model so that it is straight-forward to write the actual code. However, we still have issues related to changes in the model (such as future performance requirements, new features, computer language issues), so we need to develop a new model.

So when does the analysis model work end and the design work starts (a classical dilemma)? There's not a good answer; it really depends on each specific application. The goal is to not redo any work at a later phase that has been already done.

OOSE uses the concept of blocks that will describe how the code should be produced (see Figure 2). These blocks are design objects, and they are drawn as rectangles. One block normally aims at implementing one analysis object. However, the key issue is that these blocks are not the same objects as the analysis objects in order to keep the ideal analysis model intact.

The blocks are abstractions of the actual implementation of the system. We need to refine how the blocks interact or communicate during execution. The OOSE term is called stimulation. A stimulus is sent from one block to another to trigger an execution in that block.

To describe a sequence of stimuli, OOSE uses interaction diagrams. These describe how several blocks communicate by sending stimuli to each other (see Figure 3 on the next page). These diagrams describe in detail, for each use case, which stimuli will be sent how and in what order. A use case becomes a sequence of stimuli sent between the blocks.

In addition, the methodology uses the concept of subsystems in order to manage the design. Subsystems can contain several objects, which might be other subsystems. So we might end up with a hierarchical structuring of the system in order to manage the complexity.

Object–Oriented Construction

This step implies that the analysis model has been designed and it is time for coding. The analysis has (we hope) provided us with an ideal structure which we shall now try to keep intact as long as possible. If everything works well the objects identified during the analysis should also appear in the design. This is called in OOSE traceability. OOSE uses the concept of components in order to map the analysis stage objects into real-life source code based entities.

Note also that this stage actually does not require an object oriented language, even if it helps in mapping the design to the implementation. If the block design was done properly, it is very easy to code into objects. And by reusing objects in forms of components we could achieve more powerful constructs (aggregates).

Systems development

An important message Jacobson states in his book is the issue of systems development as part of a larger activity. This work does not take place in isolation. For instance in the banking industry data processing is just one sub-part of a larger activity providing a certain functionality set.

The output from systems development is a set of descriptions that includes the source code, diagrams, flow charts, and so on. All of these descriptions must be self-explanatory to facilitate reusability. Also, the knowledge of how to organize and manage projects must be documented so it could be made reusable (SBM is also targeting this interesting new concept of reusable design and project plans).

Using these concepts, we might eventually attain a rational approach of software development. A software house might create a library of these configuration sets, and each sub-project will receive a special combination of service packages with relevant information which has been assembled from the library of descriptions. New releases could reuse descriptions from previous releases in a controlled manner.

All this demonstrates the need for high level CASE tools and systems.

OK, OOSE made my day, but will it help me?

Well, it depends what you want from a methodology. There are two schools of thought concerning mix-and-match of various methodologies. The CASE manufacturers/providers kick and scream and say that one needs to stick to one single methodology, theirs.

The academic field generally holds that it is better to stick to one methodology in order to avoid any Byzantine solutions based on convoluted and mixed design methods.

The practical programmer is keen on creating his/her own methodology, by taking (or stealing) the best parts from various design systems (though sometimes it's darned hard to plot out all kinds of cloud figures with MacDraw without using the CASE tool from ACME Inc).

Then large corporations issue decrees that every software department will take a holy trip to the West/East coast for three days of training, and the defined methodology should be used till the end of the world.

Me? I've been looking around for a simple, nice, understandable and highly flexible methodology that could be used for personal computer application development work. I'm not stating that OOSE is the answer. However, many of the basic OOSE ideas are valid. For instance, the user is in control of an application, and the use cases based on actors are highly suitable for analysis of both what the GUI provides and what the application should achieve for the user. The book provides a lot of good ideas that the interested designer could try to implement, maybe in a pilot project, and if the end results are positive then the methodology is suitable for future work.

As is the case of most methodologies, refinement is the key-if you find a working formula, refine it instead of jumping to the next buzzword in the computing field.

Conclusions

I'm sure that all the other OO CASE and methodology vendors will step up and suggest that their methodology works where OOSE fails. And they might be right or wrong, I'm not the judge in this issue. Hey, I'm just a book reviewer. Anyway, would I recommend reading the book? As there are an unlimited number of OO books today, and time is precious when you want to ship your product tomorrow, I would suggest that if you are shopping around for a methodology, read the book for good ideas about the issues related to selecting a useful methodology. OOSE should also work for small scale projects easily-without the purchase of expensive UNIX workstation CASE tools.

The other reason I recommend that programmers read the book has to do with the background of OOSE/Objectory. It has been used in large-scale real-time system design, and 20+ years of blood, sweat and tears have certainly added a lot of understanding and insight about issues related to software construction. Admittedly, we are dealing with experience that sometimes does not map 1:1 to the personal computer application design. However, as Adele Goldberg lately stated, PC developers are discovering that the principles of object modeling will make an important difference because they have 'discovered' the need to design before coding. This is because it's maybe the first time the PC industry has to build systems instead of smaller applications.

Finally, the book contains a nice model of actors and use cases that could be used with smaller application work. I've recently seen many engineering specifications where use cases have been used to map the issues related to the analysis and design of the product. 1

References

  • Documenting Frameworks using Patterns, Ralph E. Johnson, OOPSLA'92 Conference Proceeedings
  • Object-Oriented Software for the Macintosh, Goldstein & Alger
  • "Wishful Thinking", Adele Goldberg, Object Magazine, Nov-Dec 1992
 
AAPL
$97.31
Apple Inc.
+2.59
MSFT
$44.87
Microsoft Corpora
+0.04
GOOG
$597.04
Google Inc.
+2.30

MacTech Search:
Community Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Firefox 31.0 - Fast, safe Web browser. (...
Firefox for Mac offers a fast, safe Web browsing experience. Browse quickly, securely, and effortlessly. With its industry-leading features, Firefox is the choice of Web development professionals... Read more
Little Snitch 3.3.3 - Alerts you to outg...
Little Snitch gives you control over your private outgoing data. Track background activityAs soon as your computer connects to the Internet, applications often have permission to send any... Read more
Thunderbird 31.0 - Email client from Moz...
As of July 2012, Thunderbird has transitioned to a new governance model, with new features being developed by the broader free software and open source community, and security fixes and improvements... Read more
Together 3.2 - Store and organize all of...
Together helps you organize your Mac, giving you the ability to store, edit and preview your files in a single clean, uncluttered interface. Smart storage. With simple drag-and-drop functionality,... Read more
Cyberduck 4.5 - FTP and SFTP browser. (F...
Cyberduck is a robust FTP/FTP-TLS/SFTP browser for the Mac whose lack of visual clutter and cleverly intuitive features make it easy to use. Support for external editors and system technologies such... Read more
iExplorer 3.4 - View and transfer all th...
iExplorer is an iPhone browser for Mac lets you view the files on your iOS device. By using a drag and drop interface, you can quickly copy files and folders between your Mac and your iPhone or... Read more
Airmail 1.4 - Powerful, minimal email cl...
Airmail is a powerful, minimal mail client.It was designed to retain the same experience with a single or multiple accounts and provide a quick, modern and easy-to-use user experience. Airmail... Read more
Macs Fan Control 1.1.12 - Monitor and co...
Macs Fan Control allows you to monitor and control almost any aspect of your computer's fans, with support for controlling fan speed, temperature sensors pane, menu-bar icon, and autostart with... Read more
A Better Finder Rename 9.37 - File, phot...
A Better Finder Rename is the most complete renaming solution available on the market today. That's why, since 1996, tens of thousands of hobbyists, professionals and businesses depend on A Better... Read more
MacBook Air EFI Firmware Update 2.9 - Fo...
MacBook Air EFI Firmware Update is recommended for MacBook Air (Mid 2011) models. This update addresses an issue where systems may take longer to wake from sleep than expected and fixes a rare issue... Read more

Latest Forum Discussions

See All

Ex-Angry Birds Developers Release Monsu...
Ex-Angry Birds Developers Release Monsu Teaser Trailer Posted by Jennifer Allen on July 23rd, 2014 [ permalink ] Finnish developer Boomlagoon has released a teaser trailer of their forthcoming side-scrolling action platformer, | Read more »
Lots of New Modes Have Been Added to Can...
Lots of New Modes Have Been Added to Canabalt Posted by Jennifer Allen on July 23rd, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
Stronghold 3: The Campaigns Review
Stronghold 3: The Campaigns Review By Jennifer Allen on July 23rd, 2014 Our Rating: :: DULL STRATEGIZINGiPad Only App - Designed for the iPad A cumbersome strategy game, Stronghold 3: The Campaigns has a few too many issues to... | Read more »
Table Tennis Touch on Sale for a Limited...
Table Tennis Touch on Sale for a Limited Time Posted by Jessica Fisher on July 23rd, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
Secret Files Tunguska Review
Secret Files Tunguska Review By Jennifer Allen on July 23rd, 2014 Our Rating: :: CONSPIRACY-LITTERED ADVENTURINGUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Offering traditional adventuring with no fear of in-app purchases, Secret... | Read more »
Celebrate Summer With a Cat in the Hat L...
Celebrate Summer With a Cat in the Hat Learning Library Sale Posted by Ellis Spice on July 22nd, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
Dragon Raiders Review
Dragon Raiders Review By Nadia Oxford on July 22nd, 2014 Our Rating: :: RUN, DRAGON, RUNUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Dragon Raiders is rough and scaly in some parts, but overall it’s an enjoyable level-based running... | Read more »
MyTaskList Review
MyTaskList Review By Jennifer Allen on July 22nd, 2014 Our Rating: :: EFFECTIVE IF PLAINUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad It’s not the most stylish of task management apps, but MyTaskList has all the features you could... | Read more »
FlyCraft Herbie: Crazy Machines Review
FlyCraft Herbie: Crazy Machines Review By Jennifer Allen on July 22nd, 2014 Our Rating: :: TRICKY FLYINGUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad A tough game of careful thrusting and navigation, FlyCraft Herbie: Crazy Machines... | Read more »
MTN Review
MTN Review By Jessica Fisher on July 22nd, 2014 Our Rating: :: ADORABLE, SERENE, AND AMUSINGUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad MTN is an adorable, talking pet mountain that is less game and more zen garden.   | Read more »

Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

With The Apple/IBM Alliance, Is The iPad Now...
Almost since the iPad was rolled out in 2010, and especially after Apple made a 128 GB storage configuration available in 2012, there’s been debate over whether the iPad is a serious tool for... Read more
MacBook Airs on sale starting at $799, free s...
B&H Photo has the new 2014 MacBook Airs on sale for up to $100 off MSRP for a limited time. Shipping is free, and B&H charges NY sales tax only. They also include free copies of Parallels... Read more
Apple 27″ Thunderbolt Display (refurbished) a...
The Apple Store has Apple Certified Refurbished 27″ Thunderbolt Displays available for $799 including free shipping. That’s $200 off the cost of new models. Read more
WaterField Designs Unveils Cycling Ride Pouch...
High end computer case and bag maker WaterField Designs of San Francisco now enters the cycling market with the introduction of the Cycling Ride Pouch – an upscale toolkit with a scratch-free iPhone... Read more
Kingston Digital Ships Large Capacity Near 1T...
Kingston Digital, Inc., the Flash memory affiliate of Kingston Technology Company, Inc.,has announced its latest addition to the SSDNow V300 series, the V310. The Kingston SSDNow V310 solid-state... Read more
Apple’s Fiscal Third Quarter Results; Record...
Apple has announced financial results for its fiscal 2014 third quarter ended June 28, 2014, racking up quarterly revenue of $37.4 billion and quarterly net profit of $7.7 billion, or $1.28 per... Read more
15-inch 2.0GHz MacBook Pro Retina on sale for...
B&H Photo has the 15″ 2.0GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for $1829 including free shipping plus NY sales tax only. Their price is $170 off MSRP. B&H will also include free copies of Parallels... Read more
Apple restocks refurbished Mac minis for up t...
The Apple Store has restocked Apple Certified Refurbished Mac minis for up to $150 off the cost of new models. Apple’s one-year warranty is included with each mini, and shipping is free: - 2.5GHz Mac... Read more
Twelve South HiRise For MacBook – Height-Adju...
If you use your MacBook as a workhorse desktop substitute, as many of us do, a laptop stand combined with an external keyboard and pointing device are pretty much obligatory if you want to avoid... Read more
Why The Mac Was Not Included In The Apple/IBM...
TUAW’s Yoni Heisler cites Fredrick Paul of Network World whoi blogged last week that the Mac’s conspicuous absence from Apple and IBM’s landmark partnership agreement represents a huge squandered... Read more

Jobs Board

*Apple* Solutions Consultant (ASC) - Apple (...
**Job Summary** The ASC is an Apple employee who serves as an Apple brand ambassador and influencer in a Reseller's store. The ASC's role is to grow Apple Read more
Sr. Product Leader, *Apple* Store Apps - Ap...
**Job Summary** Imagine what you could do here. At Apple , great ideas have a way of becoming great products, services, and customer experiences very quickly. Bring Read more
Sr Software Lead Engineer, *Apple* Online S...
Sr Software Lead Engineer, Apple Online Store Publishing Systems Keywords: Company: Apple Job Code: E3PCAK8MgYYkw Location (City or ZIP): Santa Clara Status: Full Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions (US) - A...
Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, you're also the Read more
*Apple* Retail - Multiple Positions (US) - A...
Sales Specialist - Retail Customer Service and Sales Transform Apple Store visitors into loyal Apple customers. When customers enter the store, you're also the Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.