TweetFollow Us on Twitter

March 95 - THE VETERAN NEOPHYTE

THE VETERAN NEOPHYTE

The Downside

DAVE JOHNSON

[IMAGE 108-111_Veteran_Neophyte1.GIF]


According to the menu bar clock on my computer screen, it was 1:38A. M. My eyes were raw and stinging, my neck was stiff, and my mind was jittery and frazzled. I had to get some sleep soon, because the alarm clock, glowing weakly red in the dark in the next room, right there next to my soundly sleeping wife and animals, was set to go off at 5:30. I'd been ready to stop two hours ago, having lost yet another entire evening to the computer, but I found that there was some obscure system structure that wasn't being disposed of when my program quit, even though I never directly created or used that structure in my code. Dang. I hate that.

The program I was writing is a kind of "magic graph paper" that can help me figure out multiperson juggling patterns. It was originally intended to be the topic of this column, but it took a lot longer to write than I thought it would, and it still isn't done; it will have to wait for some future column. So there I was, deadline approaching, without a topic. I was whining about my foiled plans to my friend Ned (a tolerant listener), complaining loudly about the amount of time and trouble it takes to write the simplest piece of code, bitching and moaning about the trials and tribulations of programming, and wondering out loud what I was going to write about.

Then it dawned on me -- write about the downside! Write about the parts of programming that frustrate you so much! Get those nasty feelings out on paper! Purge! Catharse! I could even do another little electronic survey, sort of the opposite of the "Why We Do It" column in Issue 17. Hot dawg.

So that's what this column is about: "What do people hate about programming?" I posted this question to various news groups on the Internet, and sent it out via e-mail to a bunch of programmers I know, and got some good responses. But before I tell you what other people hate about programming, first it'smy turn, and I'm ready to gripe.

Once upon a time, I loved programming. It was ahobby, something I did for the sheer joy of it, somethingthat wasfun . I welcomed the chance to learn all the arcane and grungy details of the internal workings of the computer. I binged, ignoring the demands of my home life and my body. I dove willingly into the thick, impenetrable books, joyfully grappling with myriad problems that had nothing whatever to do with the program I was writing. The program itself was in many ways incidental: it was that continual solving of difficult problems that was both the fuel and the reward, the stick and the carrot combined.

Well, I still go on binges now and then, small ones, but it's much rarer. Before, I would pursue just about any harebrained idea that crossed my feverish mind (and abandon most of them later, half constructed, often after I'd enthusiastically programmed myself into a corner). Nowadays I abandon most ideas much sooner, usually long before I even hit the keyboard. Now, every time I think of a fun programming project (which still happens often), I immediately quail at the thought of sitting down and beginning. Knowing up front how much time and effort is required to accomplish even the simplest things just makes me want to go to sleep. Call me a burnout, call me a wimp, call it growing older, or call it growing up: you'll be right on every count.

But why? What changed? It used to be so different. It used to be that I would dive in immediately at the first glimmer of an idea, hacking and slashing my way through the Toolbox with gleeful abandon, forgetting to eat, forgetting to sleep, forgetting to check errors, sitting in the same position for hours on end, staring, typing, staring, typing, staring . . .

Wait a second. That's something that bugs me about programming. Even though the action in my head is fast, furious, and fascinating, physically I just sit, stare, and type. Maybe someday I'll get enough RAM in my Duo to actually do some coding outdoors, but I'llstill be sitting, staring, and typing; I'll just have a better view on the rare occasions I remember to look up from my lap. (Come to think of it, it might be even worse, since I'll be forced to use electronic references as well: I won't even get the small breaks that I normally get while flipping pages in some weighty tome of wisdom.) So even though programming is fundamentally acreative thing, teeming with meaning and craftsmanshipand beautiful logic, there's a tradeoff. To partake of that sweet creation, you have to be willing to mostly sit still, stare at glowing humming boxes that make your face look green, and type cryptic symbols in a very strict, "filling out forms" kind of way. For hours. And hours. Andhours . I can almost feel my muscles turning to liquid, my blood slowing and thickening, gravity slowly pulling my withered flesh from my bones.

That's something else annoying about programming, and about computers in general: the amount of time they require. They are infinite time sinks, no doubt about it. Maybe time is just more precious to me now than it was before, and I'm less and less willing to spend it sitting at a computer. Writing software, in particular,always takes too long. It takes much longer than it reasonably ought to, and it takes much longer than you think it possibly can. Every time. There's a common rule of thumb for estimating how long it will take to complete a software project: come up with a reasonable estimate of the time required; then double it. Amazingly, even that doesn't do it. I've heard another, more tongue-in-cheek formula that says to take your best estimate, double it, and then jump to the next larger time unit. For example, if you think a project will take 8 weeks, first double it to 16 weeks, then change the time unit from weeks to months: 16 months is reasonable. Nowthat might actually be accurate.

(I remember some time ago there was a seminar here at Apple given by someone who had a system that was carefully worked out to produce accurate estimates of software projects. The system was entirely history based; that is, the estimates weren't based on the details of the project or the estimates of the engineers involved or the marketing plans for the product, but instead were based on how long it had taken to complete past, similar projects. It sounded very promising to me, but you know what? The estimates thus produced were so much longer than those arrived at by conventional means that real adoption of that sort of system would require a fundamental change in the way the software business is run. I haven't heard about it since.)

Part of the reason programming takes so long, of course, is that much of the time is spent on tasks that really have nothing to do with the program you're trying to write, but instead are about bookkeeping, working around the limitations of the machine, trying to figure out how to express your very clear ideas in the hobbled, awkward prose of "modern" computer languages, and so on. That's another thing I hate about programming: the mountains of mind-numbing and irrelevant detail you have to wade through and deal with to accomplish the simplest tasks. I don't really give a hoot about the details of the operation of the file system, I just want to get some information onto the disk; I don't really want to know how scroll bars work, I just want the user to be able to navigate an area larger than the window. This is, naturally, a good argument for using frameworks (among many other good arguments), but the promise is still beyond the reality, and even with a good framework there are still mountains of irrelevant detail. They're different mountains, and they might be a little smaller, but they're still mountains, and they're still irrelevant.

Another thing: software is never really done, just shipped. That's another aspect of the "infinite time sink" thing. There's always something more that can be done to make a program better, and there are always bugs that can be fixed. I've heard some artists and writers say that they never actually finish a piece, they just stop working on it (and, incidentally, that knowing when to stop is where a lot of the art is). Software is often the same way.

Programming is also addictive, and I hate that, too. (I'm starting to feel like Andy Rooney here.) It positively consumes me. There I'll be in the umpteenth hour, my eyes burning, my head aching, my neck stiff, everyone else fast asleep, warm and cozy in their nice, soft, analog beds. But I can't stop, because there's just one more little wrinkle to iron out, one more small problem to solve. And the solution to that problem leads to another problem, and the solution to that one leads to another, and . . .

Know what else I hate? Bugs. Not the plain old easy to find kind of bugs, but the nasty, subtle, elusive, intermittent kind that just don't seem to have a deterministic cause. They're an unavoidable part of programming, but I hate 'em anyway. (Seymour Papert, in his bookMindstorms, made the excellent point that programming is one of the few disciplines where you're expected to make mistakes, every time, and an integral part of the process is going back over your work, finding the inevitable mistakes, and fixing them. This is in sharp and healthy contrast to most academic subjects, where mistakes are thought of as unwelcome anomalies rather than an inevitable part of the process. An excellent reason, says Papert, to teach programming to children: it introduces them to the fact that mistakes are an integral part of real-world processes.) Knowing that there reallyis a solution to the bug (and probably an easy one) just pisses me off even more. If there's an answer, why can't I find it? And after spending days and nights sleuthing my way to an eventual answer, do I rejoice when I arrive? No, I'm just angry that I had to waste so much time on something that didn't really move me further forward. Hope starts to fade; ennui begins its inexorable descent.

And finally, well, programminghurts. It hurts my body, and it also hurts my brain. It's unnatural to think like that, composing long strings of imperatives, with no subtlety or nuance or fuzziness of meaning allowed, especially for long, uninterrupted periods of time. It's somehow dehumanizing, because to program well you have to assume the characteristics of the machine, you have to think like one, you have to make your thoughts linear and ordered. It's just not normal.

All right, that's probably enough personal griping. Ido feel a little better having gotten that off my chest, here in public. Now let's see what other people had to say.

In general I was surprised at the paucity of responses, at least compared to the veritable flood of replies I got when I asked what peopleliked about programming. Of course, I was asking programmers, and since they do it for a living they presumably don't hate it too much.

Of the responses I got, the most commonly hated thing by far was bad or broken tools. This wasn't surprising; programmerslove to complain about their tools. In particular, buggy compilers were soundly thrashed from all sides as the worst time wasters around. Dealing with your own bugs is one thing; that's a normal part of the programming process. Dealing with bugs in your tools, though, and having to work around them, is something else entirely:

I LIKE programming. The only things that bother me are things that are not under my control, like compiler bugs. I hate that. -- Matt DiMeo

After a while, the tools got to me. Tools with bugs and bad interfaces made the day-to-day work more like digging a ditch than the artistic expression it maybe could be. I don't like to dig ditches, I like it to be interesting. -- Bo3b Johnson, semiretired programmer (the "3" is silent)

This is one of the things that came up over and over: the primitive state of the tools available. Programmers in particular, since they know intimately what the machine is capable of, are appalled at the state of the tools available for programming. Memory management was cited often as a needless hassle -- many C and C++ programmers actually mentioned dynamic languages in a positive light,mostly because of the automatic memory management and the banishing of the compile-link-debug cycle.

Lots of folks also complained about the job of programming, and most of those complaints fell into the realm of "the nonprogrammers just don't get it."

The interactions with the management. You know, these silly men with ties that say, "Well, you should change that program to act THIS way, and not in the way we agreed last week," when you have the job half done. -- Maurizio Loreti

Maybe that's why geeks seem to congregate in groups: only other geeks really get it.

Interestingly (from my Macintosh perspective), a number of people mentioned interface programming as something they hated:

I have a special hate mode for doing GUI programming. It's boring, it's arcane, and it's ill behaved. Give me systems, give me new real terrain to learn and think about, but leave the GUI programming to robots! -- Jeffrey Greenberg

This surprised me a little, I must admit, partly because I reallylike that part of programming. Almost all of my little toy projects involve lots of clicking and dragging of widgets on the screen, and now that I think of it, programming didn't really begin to interest me until I discovered the Macintosh and user interaction. But hey, everyone's entitled to an opinion.

Another frequently mentioned offender was lousy APIs:

Number two: Poorly designed OS and peripheral interfaces, where I have to keep track of a lot of "moving parts" to do something that should be straightforward. -- Tom Breton

That's another example of something that seems pervasive: complaints about the software layers that surround most programs these days. It's pretty much unavoidable now; you can't write a program without depending heavily on the software environment you're programming for. Your software is controlled from the outside by other software (typically a GUI these days), and in turn your software isn't directly controlling the machine like in the good old days, but is instead callingother pieces of software (like the Toolbox or a framework) to accomplish its tasks. So naturally it's annoying when the software you depend on is badly designed or buggy. Unfortunately, it's all too common an occurrence.

A few also mentioned a lack of programming quality or a lack of professionalism as a big downside:

I get really livid when I find a reckless patch or hack in products, specifically those that make a nightmare for future development and integration. They demonstrate a selfish and irresponsible form of engineering. -- Dave Evans

Unfortunately, most of the programmers I've been around are immature and not well managed, so you end up with these massive schedule and quality problems. I claim it's immaturity, because if we are still stuck in low gear trying to impress our friends with our tricky code, that's high school behavior. That's mostly what I saw. "Ooh, I can save 12 bytes if I write this in a stupid way. Aren't I clever?" Too bad no one can read it. Or, "Ooh, I can make this faster if I write it obscurely. I'm so cool." Never mind that it never gets used. That sort of lack of professionalism is what put me over the edge. -- Bo3b Johnson

Finally, and near and dear to my heart, is the issue of being forced to interact with the machine: I hate the actual typing in of all the stuff. After a pleasant period of roaming around, scribbling down nice little try-outs and possible solutions, just using old pieces of paper, lying down on the couch, thinking a bit, reading a bit, talking things over with a couple of colleagues, there comes a long, boring period when I'm almost chained to that silly desk, sitting in front of that silly machine, banging that silly keyboard, trying to express my illuminated thoughts in some sort of silly programming language . . . I want my couch, I want my can of beer, I want my cigarettes and my books; THAT'S how I want to program. -- Jos Horsmeier

. . . spending the greater part of my life at a !#@!$* keyboard, staring at a !$&*!# monitor. -- Anonymous

Yep, that's the part that I hate the most, too; in order to program I have to spend huge amounts of my time sitting at the computer. You know, digging ditches is starting to sound better and better. It's tactile, it's immediate, it's outdoors, it uses muscles beyond those in your forearms, it doesn't consume or pollute your mind, there's no irrelevant detail to deal with, and when you're done you're done. Though I could be wrong, I don'tthink ditch digging is addictive, and I'm quite sure that there's no possibility of subtle and elusive bugs. Sounds good.

Hey, that gives me an idea! With QuickDraw GX's great hit testing and picture hierarchies, I could write a really cool ditch-digging simulator . . .

RECOMMENDED READING

  • Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson (Bantam Books, 1992).
  • Chicken Soup, Boots by Maira Kalman (Viking, 1993).

DAVE JOHNSON has an inordinate (some say irrational) love of playground swings. He's been a lover of swings and swinging as long as he can remember, and still does backflips out of them from maximum height, impressing mightily any kids who might be watching. He's also been known to suddenly stop the car and leap out at the sight of a swing set he hasn't visited before. No swing shall be left unswung.*

Thanks to Jeff Barbose, Brian Hamlin, Bo3b Johnson, Lisa Jongewaard, and Ned van Alstyne for their always enlightening review comments.*

Dave welcomes feedback on his musings. He can be reached at JOHNSON.DK on AppleLink, dkj@apple.com on the Internet, or 75300,715 on CompuServe.*

 

Community Search:
MacTech Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Apple iTunes 12.2 - Play Apple Music...
Apple iTunes lets you organize and stream Apple Music, download and watch video and listen to Podcasts. It can automatically download new music, app, and book purchases across all your devices and... Read more
Apple Security Update 2015-005 - For OS...
Apple Security Update 2015-005 is recommended for all users and improves the security of OS X. For detailed information about the security content of this update, please visit: http://support.apple.... Read more
Apple HP Printer Drivers 3.1 - For OS X...
Apple HP Printer Drivers includes the latest HP printing and scanning software for OS X Lion or later. For information about supported printer models, see this page. Version 3.1: The latest printing... Read more
Epson Printer Drivers 3.1 - For OS X 10....
Epson Printer Drivers installs the latest software for your EPSON printer or scanner for OS X Yosemite, OS X Mavericks, OS X Mountain Lion, and OS X Lion. For more information about printing and... Read more
Xcode 6.4 - Integrated development envir...
Xcode provides everything developers need to create great applications for Mac, iPhone, and iPad. Xcode brings user interface design, coding, testing, and debugging into a united workflow. The Xcode... Read more
OS X Yosemite 10.10.4 - Apple's lat...
OS X Yosemite is Apple's newest operating system for Mac. An elegant design that feels entirely fresh, yet inherently familiar. The apps you use every day, enhanced with new features. And a... Read more
Dash 3.0.2 - Instant search and offline...
Dash is an API Documentation Browser and Code Snippet Manager. Dash helps you store snippets of code, as well as instantly search and browse documentation for almost any API you might use (for a full... Read more
FontExplorer X Pro 5.0 - Font management...
FontExplorer X Pro is optimized for professional use; it's the solution that gives you the power you need to manage all your fonts. Now you can more easily manage, activate and organize your... Read more
Typinator 6.6 - Speedy and reliable text...
Typinator turbo-charges your typing productivity. Type a little. Typinator does the rest. We've all faced projects that require repetitive typing tasks. With Typinator, you can store commonly used... Read more
Arq 4.12.1 - Online backup to Google Dri...
Arq is super-easy online backup for the Mac. Back up to your own Google Drive storage (15GB free storage), your own Amazon Glacier ($.01/GB per month storage) or S3, or any SFTP server. Arq backs up... Read more

Hands-On With Raceline CC
Set for release soon, Rebellion’s motorbike racing game, Raceline CC certainly looks stylish. But how does it play? I got my hands on a preview build to answer exactly that. | Read more »
Siegefall - Tips, Tricks, and Strategies...
So, you fancy establishing a base and ruling the world again. Siegefall is a convenient place to do that, but how about some great tips and tricks on how best to go about it? Here are a few ideas on how to get ahead as a beginner to this medieval... | Read more »
The WWE Comes to Racing Rivals - Because...
Racing Rivals is a racing game that's all about, well, rivalry. And who knows rivalry better than WWE superstars (shhhh, that was rhetorical)? [Read more] | Read more »
Hey, Who Put Apple Music in My SoundHoun...
One of the App Store's popular music discovery sources - SoundHound - has already been updated to include Apple's own music discovery source - Apple Music. That was fast! [Read more] | Read more »
Arcane Legends has a New Expansion Calle...
Arcane Legends has been going strong since it debuted at the tail end of 2012. So well, in fact, that it's already up to its sixth expansion. [Read more] | Read more »
Vector 2 is Officially a Thing and it...
Vector is a pretty cool parkour-driven runner that's gotten a pretty decent following since it first came out - although personally I think more people could stand to show it some love. Anyway, Nekki has announced that a sequel isofficially on its... | Read more »
Get Ready to Trucksform and Roll Out (an...
It looks like NuOxygen is bringing the truck-transforming racer Trucksform (get it?) to iOS in a couple of weeks. Although really it's more of an auto-driver than a racer. But still, transforming trucks! [Read more] | Read more »
This Week at 148Apps:June 22-26, 2015
June's Summer Journey Continues With 148Apps How do you know what apps are worth your time and money? Just look to the review team at 148Apps. We sort through the chaos and find the apps you're looking for. The ones we love become Editor’s Choice,... | Read more »
LEGO® Minifigures Online (Games)
LEGO® Minifigures Online 1.0.1 Device: iOS iPhone Category: Games Price: $4.99, Version: 1.0.1 (iTunes) Description: | Read more »
World of Tanks Blitz celebrates its firs...
Today marks the first anniversary of the launch of World of Tanks Blitz, the mobile version of the PC tank battler, World of Tanks. World of Tanks Blitz launched on iOS and Android on June 26th last year and to celebrate, Wargaming is giving all... | Read more »

Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

Apple Releases OS X 10.10.4 With WIFi Fix, iO...
On Tuesday, Apple released final versions of OS X 10.10.4 and iOS 8.4, as well as updates for the Safari browser for OS X Yosemite, Mavericks, and Mountain Lion. The OS X 10.10.4 update focuses on... Read more
Dual-Band High-Gain Antennas for Home Wi-Fi N...
Linksys has announced what it claims are the first dual-band, omni-directional high-gain antennas for the consumer market. The new Linksys high-gain antennas available in a 2- and 4-pack (WRT004ANT... Read more
Apple refurbished 2014 15-inch Retina MacBook...
The Apple Store has Apple Certified Refurbished 2014 15″ 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pros available for $1609, $390 off original MSRP. Apple’s one-year warranty is included, and shipping is free. They have... Read more
Clearance 2014 MacBook Airs available for up...
Adorama has 2014 MacBook Airs on sale for up to $301 off original MSRP including NY + NJ sales tax and free shipping: - 11″ 256GB MacBook Air: $798 $301 off original MSRP - 13″ 128GB MacBook Air: $... Read more
5K iMacs on sale for $100 off MSRP, free ship...
B&H Photo has the new 27″ 3.3GHz 5K iMac on sale for $1899.99 including free shipping plus NY tax only. Their price is $100 off MSRP. They have the 27″ 3.5GHz 5K iMac on sale for $2199, also $100... Read more
27-inch 3.2GHz iMac on sale for $1679, save $...
B&H Photo has the 27″ 3.2GHz iMac on sale for $1679.99 including free shipping plus NY sales tax only. Their price is $120 off MSRP. Read more
12-inch 1.2GHz Gray MacBook on sale for $1487...
Amazon.com has the new 12″ 1.2GHz Gray MacBook in stock and on sale for $1487 including free shipping. Their price is $102 off MSRP, and it’s the lowest price available for this model. We expect... Read more
15-inch 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for...
Amazon.com has the 15″ 2.2GHz Retina MacBook Pro on sale for $1819 including free shipping. Their price is $180 off MSRP, and it’s the lowest price available for this model. Read more
OtterBox Releases New Symmetry Series Metalli...
Otterbox’s new Symmetry Series of smartphone cases flaunts the best of both both street style and street smarts with their new metallic finishes and trusted OtterBox protection for iPhone 6 and... Read more
Eliminate Cable Chaos with New GE Branded Wra...
GE licensee Jasco Products has introduced a new line of GE branded Wrap-n-Charge USB wall chargers with built-in cable management. “We are always working to combine great technology with innovative... Read more

Jobs Board

*Apple* TV Live Streaming Frameworks Test En...
**Job Summary** Work and contribute towards the engineering of Apple 's state-of-the-art products involving video, audio, and graphics in Interactive Media Group (IMG) at Read more
Project Manager, WW *Apple* Fulfillment Ope...
…a senior project manager / business analyst to work within our Worldwide Apple Fulfillment Operations and the Business Process Re-engineering team. This role will work Read more
Senior Data Scientist, *Apple* Retail - Onl...
**Job Summary** Apple Retail - Online sells Apple products to customers around the world. In addition to selling Apple products with unique services such as iPad Read more
*Apple* Music Producer - Apple (United State...
**Job Summary** Apple Music seeks a Producer to help shepherd some of the most important content and editorial initiatives within the music app, with a particular focus Read more
Sr. Technical Services Consultant, *Apple*...
**Job Summary** Apple Professional Services (APS) has an opening for a senior technical position that contributes to Apple 's efforts for strategic and transactional Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.