TweetFollow Us on Twitter

March 95 - THE VETERAN NEOPHYTE

THE VETERAN NEOPHYTE

The Downside

DAVE JOHNSON

[IMAGE 108-111_Veteran_Neophyte1.GIF]


According to the menu bar clock on my computer screen, it was 1:38A. M. My eyes were raw and stinging, my neck was stiff, and my mind was jittery and frazzled. I had to get some sleep soon, because the alarm clock, glowing weakly red in the dark in the next room, right there next to my soundly sleeping wife and animals, was set to go off at 5:30. I'd been ready to stop two hours ago, having lost yet another entire evening to the computer, but I found that there was some obscure system structure that wasn't being disposed of when my program quit, even though I never directly created or used that structure in my code. Dang. I hate that.

The program I was writing is a kind of "magic graph paper" that can help me figure out multiperson juggling patterns. It was originally intended to be the topic of this column, but it took a lot longer to write than I thought it would, and it still isn't done; it will have to wait for some future column. So there I was, deadline approaching, without a topic. I was whining about my foiled plans to my friend Ned (a tolerant listener), complaining loudly about the amount of time and trouble it takes to write the simplest piece of code, bitching and moaning about the trials and tribulations of programming, and wondering out loud what I was going to write about.

Then it dawned on me -- write about the downside! Write about the parts of programming that frustrate you so much! Get those nasty feelings out on paper! Purge! Catharse! I could even do another little electronic survey, sort of the opposite of the "Why We Do It" column in Issue 17. Hot dawg.

So that's what this column is about: "What do people hate about programming?" I posted this question to various news groups on the Internet, and sent it out via e-mail to a bunch of programmers I know, and got some good responses. But before I tell you what other people hate about programming, first it'smy turn, and I'm ready to gripe.

Once upon a time, I loved programming. It was ahobby, something I did for the sheer joy of it, somethingthat wasfun . I welcomed the chance to learn all the arcane and grungy details of the internal workings of the computer. I binged, ignoring the demands of my home life and my body. I dove willingly into the thick, impenetrable books, joyfully grappling with myriad problems that had nothing whatever to do with the program I was writing. The program itself was in many ways incidental: it was that continual solving of difficult problems that was both the fuel and the reward, the stick and the carrot combined.

Well, I still go on binges now and then, small ones, but it's much rarer. Before, I would pursue just about any harebrained idea that crossed my feverish mind (and abandon most of them later, half constructed, often after I'd enthusiastically programmed myself into a corner). Nowadays I abandon most ideas much sooner, usually long before I even hit the keyboard. Now, every time I think of a fun programming project (which still happens often), I immediately quail at the thought of sitting down and beginning. Knowing up front how much time and effort is required to accomplish even the simplest things just makes me want to go to sleep. Call me a burnout, call me a wimp, call it growing older, or call it growing up: you'll be right on every count.

But why? What changed? It used to be so different. It used to be that I would dive in immediately at the first glimmer of an idea, hacking and slashing my way through the Toolbox with gleeful abandon, forgetting to eat, forgetting to sleep, forgetting to check errors, sitting in the same position for hours on end, staring, typing, staring, typing, staring . . .

Wait a second. That's something that bugs me about programming. Even though the action in my head is fast, furious, and fascinating, physically I just sit, stare, and type. Maybe someday I'll get enough RAM in my Duo to actually do some coding outdoors, but I'llstill be sitting, staring, and typing; I'll just have a better view on the rare occasions I remember to look up from my lap. (Come to think of it, it might be even worse, since I'll be forced to use electronic references as well: I won't even get the small breaks that I normally get while flipping pages in some weighty tome of wisdom.) So even though programming is fundamentally acreative thing, teeming with meaning and craftsmanshipand beautiful logic, there's a tradeoff. To partake of that sweet creation, you have to be willing to mostly sit still, stare at glowing humming boxes that make your face look green, and type cryptic symbols in a very strict, "filling out forms" kind of way. For hours. And hours. Andhours . I can almost feel my muscles turning to liquid, my blood slowing and thickening, gravity slowly pulling my withered flesh from my bones.

That's something else annoying about programming, and about computers in general: the amount of time they require. They are infinite time sinks, no doubt about it. Maybe time is just more precious to me now than it was before, and I'm less and less willing to spend it sitting at a computer. Writing software, in particular,always takes too long. It takes much longer than it reasonably ought to, and it takes much longer than you think it possibly can. Every time. There's a common rule of thumb for estimating how long it will take to complete a software project: come up with a reasonable estimate of the time required; then double it. Amazingly, even that doesn't do it. I've heard another, more tongue-in-cheek formula that says to take your best estimate, double it, and then jump to the next larger time unit. For example, if you think a project will take 8 weeks, first double it to 16 weeks, then change the time unit from weeks to months: 16 months is reasonable. Nowthat might actually be accurate.

(I remember some time ago there was a seminar here at Apple given by someone who had a system that was carefully worked out to produce accurate estimates of software projects. The system was entirely history based; that is, the estimates weren't based on the details of the project or the estimates of the engineers involved or the marketing plans for the product, but instead were based on how long it had taken to complete past, similar projects. It sounded very promising to me, but you know what? The estimates thus produced were so much longer than those arrived at by conventional means that real adoption of that sort of system would require a fundamental change in the way the software business is run. I haven't heard about it since.)

Part of the reason programming takes so long, of course, is that much of the time is spent on tasks that really have nothing to do with the program you're trying to write, but instead are about bookkeeping, working around the limitations of the machine, trying to figure out how to express your very clear ideas in the hobbled, awkward prose of "modern" computer languages, and so on. That's another thing I hate about programming: the mountains of mind-numbing and irrelevant detail you have to wade through and deal with to accomplish the simplest tasks. I don't really give a hoot about the details of the operation of the file system, I just want to get some information onto the disk; I don't really want to know how scroll bars work, I just want the user to be able to navigate an area larger than the window. This is, naturally, a good argument for using frameworks (among many other good arguments), but the promise is still beyond the reality, and even with a good framework there are still mountains of irrelevant detail. They're different mountains, and they might be a little smaller, but they're still mountains, and they're still irrelevant.

Another thing: software is never really done, just shipped. That's another aspect of the "infinite time sink" thing. There's always something more that can be done to make a program better, and there are always bugs that can be fixed. I've heard some artists and writers say that they never actually finish a piece, they just stop working on it (and, incidentally, that knowing when to stop is where a lot of the art is). Software is often the same way.

Programming is also addictive, and I hate that, too. (I'm starting to feel like Andy Rooney here.) It positively consumes me. There I'll be in the umpteenth hour, my eyes burning, my head aching, my neck stiff, everyone else fast asleep, warm and cozy in their nice, soft, analog beds. But I can't stop, because there's just one more little wrinkle to iron out, one more small problem to solve. And the solution to that problem leads to another problem, and the solution to that one leads to another, and . . .

Know what else I hate? Bugs. Not the plain old easy to find kind of bugs, but the nasty, subtle, elusive, intermittent kind that just don't seem to have a deterministic cause. They're an unavoidable part of programming, but I hate 'em anyway. (Seymour Papert, in his bookMindstorms, made the excellent point that programming is one of the few disciplines where you're expected to make mistakes, every time, and an integral part of the process is going back over your work, finding the inevitable mistakes, and fixing them. This is in sharp and healthy contrast to most academic subjects, where mistakes are thought of as unwelcome anomalies rather than an inevitable part of the process. An excellent reason, says Papert, to teach programming to children: it introduces them to the fact that mistakes are an integral part of real-world processes.) Knowing that there reallyis a solution to the bug (and probably an easy one) just pisses me off even more. If there's an answer, why can't I find it? And after spending days and nights sleuthing my way to an eventual answer, do I rejoice when I arrive? No, I'm just angry that I had to waste so much time on something that didn't really move me further forward. Hope starts to fade; ennui begins its inexorable descent.

And finally, well, programminghurts. It hurts my body, and it also hurts my brain. It's unnatural to think like that, composing long strings of imperatives, with no subtlety or nuance or fuzziness of meaning allowed, especially for long, uninterrupted periods of time. It's somehow dehumanizing, because to program well you have to assume the characteristics of the machine, you have to think like one, you have to make your thoughts linear and ordered. It's just not normal.

All right, that's probably enough personal griping. Ido feel a little better having gotten that off my chest, here in public. Now let's see what other people had to say.

In general I was surprised at the paucity of responses, at least compared to the veritable flood of replies I got when I asked what peopleliked about programming. Of course, I was asking programmers, and since they do it for a living they presumably don't hate it too much.

Of the responses I got, the most commonly hated thing by far was bad or broken tools. This wasn't surprising; programmerslove to complain about their tools. In particular, buggy compilers were soundly thrashed from all sides as the worst time wasters around. Dealing with your own bugs is one thing; that's a normal part of the programming process. Dealing with bugs in your tools, though, and having to work around them, is something else entirely:

I LIKE programming. The only things that bother me are things that are not under my control, like compiler bugs. I hate that. -- Matt DiMeo

After a while, the tools got to me. Tools with bugs and bad interfaces made the day-to-day work more like digging a ditch than the artistic expression it maybe could be. I don't like to dig ditches, I like it to be interesting. -- Bo3b Johnson, semiretired programmer (the "3" is silent)

This is one of the things that came up over and over: the primitive state of the tools available. Programmers in particular, since they know intimately what the machine is capable of, are appalled at the state of the tools available for programming. Memory management was cited often as a needless hassle -- many C and C++ programmers actually mentioned dynamic languages in a positive light,mostly because of the automatic memory management and the banishing of the compile-link-debug cycle.

Lots of folks also complained about the job of programming, and most of those complaints fell into the realm of "the nonprogrammers just don't get it."

The interactions with the management. You know, these silly men with ties that say, "Well, you should change that program to act THIS way, and not in the way we agreed last week," when you have the job half done. -- Maurizio Loreti

Maybe that's why geeks seem to congregate in groups: only other geeks really get it.

Interestingly (from my Macintosh perspective), a number of people mentioned interface programming as something they hated:

I have a special hate mode for doing GUI programming. It's boring, it's arcane, and it's ill behaved. Give me systems, give me new real terrain to learn and think about, but leave the GUI programming to robots! -- Jeffrey Greenberg

This surprised me a little, I must admit, partly because I reallylike that part of programming. Almost all of my little toy projects involve lots of clicking and dragging of widgets on the screen, and now that I think of it, programming didn't really begin to interest me until I discovered the Macintosh and user interaction. But hey, everyone's entitled to an opinion.

Another frequently mentioned offender was lousy APIs:

Number two: Poorly designed OS and peripheral interfaces, where I have to keep track of a lot of "moving parts" to do something that should be straightforward. -- Tom Breton

That's another example of something that seems pervasive: complaints about the software layers that surround most programs these days. It's pretty much unavoidable now; you can't write a program without depending heavily on the software environment you're programming for. Your software is controlled from the outside by other software (typically a GUI these days), and in turn your software isn't directly controlling the machine like in the good old days, but is instead callingother pieces of software (like the Toolbox or a framework) to accomplish its tasks. So naturally it's annoying when the software you depend on is badly designed or buggy. Unfortunately, it's all too common an occurrence.

A few also mentioned a lack of programming quality or a lack of professionalism as a big downside:

I get really livid when I find a reckless patch or hack in products, specifically those that make a nightmare for future development and integration. They demonstrate a selfish and irresponsible form of engineering. -- Dave Evans

Unfortunately, most of the programmers I've been around are immature and not well managed, so you end up with these massive schedule and quality problems. I claim it's immaturity, because if we are still stuck in low gear trying to impress our friends with our tricky code, that's high school behavior. That's mostly what I saw. "Ooh, I can save 12 bytes if I write this in a stupid way. Aren't I clever?" Too bad no one can read it. Or, "Ooh, I can make this faster if I write it obscurely. I'm so cool." Never mind that it never gets used. That sort of lack of professionalism is what put me over the edge. -- Bo3b Johnson

Finally, and near and dear to my heart, is the issue of being forced to interact with the machine: I hate the actual typing in of all the stuff. After a pleasant period of roaming around, scribbling down nice little try-outs and possible solutions, just using old pieces of paper, lying down on the couch, thinking a bit, reading a bit, talking things over with a couple of colleagues, there comes a long, boring period when I'm almost chained to that silly desk, sitting in front of that silly machine, banging that silly keyboard, trying to express my illuminated thoughts in some sort of silly programming language . . . I want my couch, I want my can of beer, I want my cigarettes and my books; THAT'S how I want to program. -- Jos Horsmeier

. . . spending the greater part of my life at a !#@!$* keyboard, staring at a !$&*!# monitor. -- Anonymous

Yep, that's the part that I hate the most, too; in order to program I have to spend huge amounts of my time sitting at the computer. You know, digging ditches is starting to sound better and better. It's tactile, it's immediate, it's outdoors, it uses muscles beyond those in your forearms, it doesn't consume or pollute your mind, there's no irrelevant detail to deal with, and when you're done you're done. Though I could be wrong, I don'tthink ditch digging is addictive, and I'm quite sure that there's no possibility of subtle and elusive bugs. Sounds good.

Hey, that gives me an idea! With QuickDraw GX's great hit testing and picture hierarchies, I could write a really cool ditch-digging simulator . . .

RECOMMENDED READING

  • Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson (Bantam Books, 1992).
  • Chicken Soup, Boots by Maira Kalman (Viking, 1993).

DAVE JOHNSON has an inordinate (some say irrational) love of playground swings. He's been a lover of swings and swinging as long as he can remember, and still does backflips out of them from maximum height, impressing mightily any kids who might be watching. He's also been known to suddenly stop the car and leap out at the sight of a swing set he hasn't visited before. No swing shall be left unswung.*

Thanks to Jeff Barbose, Brian Hamlin, Bo3b Johnson, Lisa Jongewaard, and Ned van Alstyne for their always enlightening review comments.*

Dave welcomes feedback on his musings. He can be reached at JOHNSON.DK on AppleLink, dkj@apple.com on the Internet, or 75300,715 on CompuServe.*

 
AAPL
$97.03
Apple Inc.
-0.16
MSFT
$44.40
Microsoft Corpora
-0.47
GOOG
$593.35
Google Inc.
-2.63

MacTech Search:
Community Search:

Software Updates via MacUpdate

Audio Hijack Pro 2.11.0 - Record and enh...
Audio Hijack Pro drastically changes the way you use audio on your computer, giving you the freedom to listen to audio when you want and how you want. Record and enhance any audio with Audio Hijack... Read more
Intermission 1.1.1 - Pause and rewind li...
Intermission allows you to pause and rewind live audio from any application on your Mac. Intermission will buffer up to 3 hours of audio, allowing users to skip through any assortment of audio... Read more
Airfoil 4.8.7 - Send audio from any app...
Airfoil allows you to send any audio to AirPort Express units, Apple TVs, and even other Macs and PCs, all in sync! It's your audio - everywhere. With Airfoil you can take audio from any... Read more
Microsoft Remote Desktop 8.0.8 - Connect...
With Microsoft Remote Desktop, you can connect to a remote PC and your work resources from almost anywhere. Experience the power of Windows with RemoteFX in a Remote Desktop client designed to help... Read more
xACT 2.30 - Audio compression toolkit. (...
xACT stands for X Aaudio Compression Toolkit, an application that encodes and decodes FLAC, SHN, Monkey’s Audio, TTA, Wavpack, and Apple Lossless files. It also can encode these formats to MP3, AAC... Read more
Firefox 31.0 - Fast, safe Web browser. (...
Firefox for Mac offers a fast, safe Web browsing experience. Browse quickly, securely, and effortlessly. With its industry-leading features, Firefox is the choice of Web development professionals... Read more
Little Snitch 3.3.3 - Alerts you to outg...
Little Snitch gives you control over your private outgoing data. Track background activityAs soon as your computer connects to the Internet, applications often have permission to send any... Read more
Thunderbird 31.0 - Email client from Moz...
As of July 2012, Thunderbird has transitioned to a new governance model, with new features being developed by the broader free software and open source community, and security fixes and improvements... Read more
Together 3.2 - Store and organize all of...
Together helps you organize your Mac, giving you the ability to store, edit and preview your files in a single clean, uncluttered interface. Smart storage. With simple drag-and-drop functionality,... Read more
Cyberduck 4.5 - FTP and SFTP browser. (F...
Cyberduck is a robust FTP/FTP-TLS/SFTP browser for the Mac whose lack of visual clutter and cleverly intuitive features make it easy to use. Support for external editors and system technologies such... Read more

Latest Forum Discussions

See All

LEX Goes Free For One Day In Honor of Ne...
LEX Goes Free For One Day In Honor of New Update Posted by Jennifer Allen on July 24th, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
Thomas Was Alone Goes Universal, Slashes...
Thomas Was Alone Goes Universal, Slashes Price to $3.99 Posted by Ellis Spice on July 24th, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
Meerkatz Challenge Review
Meerkatz Challenge Review By Jennifer Allen on July 24th, 2014 Our Rating: :: FONDLY PUZZLINGUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Cute and challenging, Meerkatz Challenge is a fun puzzle game, particularly for fans of... | Read more »
Book Your Appointment with F.E.A.R. this...
Book Your Appointment with F.E.A.R. | Read more »
It Came From Canada: Epic Skater
For all the hate that it gets for being a pastime for slackers, skateboarding really does require a lot of skill. All those flips and spins take real athleticism, and there’s all the jargon to memorize. Fortunately for us less extreme individuals,... | Read more »
Cultures Review
Cultures Review By Jennifer Allen on July 24th, 2014 Our Rating: :: SLOW-PACED EMPIRE BUILDINGiPad Only App - Designed for the iPad Cute it might seem, but Cultures is a bit too slow paced when it comes to those pesky timers to... | Read more »
More Paintings Have Been Added to Paint...
More Paintings Have Been Added to Paint it Back! Posted by Jessica Fisher on July 24th, 2014 [ permalink ] Universal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad | Read more »
The Order of Souls Review
The Order of Souls Review By Campbell Bird on July 24th, 2014 Our Rating: :: STORY GRINDUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad The Order of Souls is a free-to-play, turn-based RPG with a genre-mixing art style, interesting... | Read more »
Revolution 60 Review
Revolution 60 Review By Jordan Minor on July 24th, 2014 Our Rating: :: LASS EFFECTUniversal App - Designed for iPhone and iPad Revolution 60 is a bold, cinematic action game with ambition to spare.   | Read more »
Matter (Photography)
Matter 1.0.1 Device: iOS Universal Category: Photography Price: $1.99, Version: 1.0.1 (iTunes) Description: Add stunning 3D effects to your photos with real-time shadows and reflections. Export your creations as photos or video loops... | Read more »

Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

Global Tablet Market Grows 11% in Q2/14 Notwi...
Worldwide tablet sales grew 11.0 percent year over year in the second quarter of 2014, with shipments reaching 49.3 million units according to preliminary data from the International Data Corporation... Read more
Save on 5th generation refurbished iPod touch...
The Apple Store has Apple Certified Refurbished 5th generation iPod touches available starting at $149. Apple’s one-year warranty is included with each model, and shipping is free. Many, but not all... Read more
What Should Apple’s Next MacBook Priority Be;...
Stabley Times’ Phil Moore says that after expanding its iMac lineup with a new low end model, Apple’s next Mac hardware decision will be how it wants to approach expanding its MacBook lineup as well... Read more
ArtRage For iPhone Painting App Free During C...
ArtRage for iPhone is currently being offered for free (regularly $1.99) during Comic-Con San Diego #SDCC, July 24-27, in celebration of the upcoming ArtRage 4.5 and other 64-bit versions of the... Read more
With The Apple/IBM Alliance, Is The iPad Now...
Almost since the iPad was rolled out in 2010, and especially after Apple made a 128 GB storage configuration available in 2012, there’s been debate over whether the iPad is a serious tool for... Read more
MacBook Airs on sale starting at $799, free s...
B&H Photo has the new 2014 MacBook Airs on sale for up to $100 off MSRP for a limited time. Shipping is free, and B&H charges NY sales tax only. They also include free copies of Parallels... Read more
Apple 27″ Thunderbolt Display (refurbished) a...
The Apple Store has Apple Certified Refurbished 27″ Thunderbolt Displays available for $799 including free shipping. That’s $200 off the cost of new models. Read more
WaterField Designs Unveils Cycling Ride Pouch...
High end computer case and bag maker WaterField Designs of San Francisco now enters the cycling market with the introduction of the Cycling Ride Pouch – an upscale toolkit with a scratch-free iPhone... Read more
Kingston Digital Ships Large Capacity Near 1T...
Kingston Digital, Inc., the Flash memory affiliate of Kingston Technology Company, Inc.,has announced its latest addition to the SSDNow V300 series, the V310. The Kingston SSDNow V310 solid-state... Read more
Apple’s Fiscal Third Quarter Results; Record...
Apple has announced financial results for its fiscal 2014 third quarter ended June 28, 2014, racking up quarterly revenue of $37.4 billion and quarterly net profit of $7.7 billion, or $1.28 per... Read more

Jobs Board

Sr. Project Manager for *Apple* Campus 2 -...
…the design and construction of one building or building components of the New Apple Campus located in Cupertino, CA. They will provide project management oversight for Read more
WW Sales Program Manager, *Apple* Online St...
**Job Summary** Imagine what you could do here. At Apple , great ideas have a way of becoming great products, services, and customer experiences very quickly. Bring Read more
*Apple* Solutions Consultant (ASC) - Apple (...
**Job Summary** The ASC is an Apple employee who serves as an Apple brand ambassador and influencer in a Reseller's store. The ASC's role is to grow Apple Read more
Project Manager / Business Analyst, WW *Appl...
…a senior project manager / business analyst to work within our Worldwide Apple Fulfillment Operations and the Business Process Re-engineering team. This role will work Read more
Sr. Manager, *Apple* Deployment Programs fo...
**Job Summary** Apple is seeking candidates for a new position on the Education Content and Technology team. iPad and Mac is in the hands of millions of teachers and Read more
All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.